Workshop Minutes

City of Beacon Council Workshop Meeting

January 29, 2007

WORKSHOP MEETING

 

The City of Beacon Council Workshop began at 7:00 at the Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza on January 29, 2007.

 

Those in attendance were:  Mayor Clara Lou Gould,

Council Members:  Lee Kyriacou, Elizabeth Foster, Charles Kelly, Phil Shea, and Steve Gold

Also in attendance were:  City Administrator, Joseph Braun and City Attorney Gerard Pisanelli.

Excused: Eleanor Thompson

 

Workshop Agenda

 

Stormwater Management - Guest Speaker:  Barbara Kendall, Watershed Special Projects Coordinator - Hudson River Estuary Program - Region 3

 

The following items were discussed in her slide presentation:

 

Local Stormwater Management Programs to Protect Water Resources and Enhance our Communities. 

Environmental Priority of Stormwater.  90% of remaining water quality problems are from nonpoint sources.  Water Quality Impacts - Water quantity impacts from flooding:  Loss of life, damage to property, flooding:  How Will we Meet this Challenge?  Federal Stormwater Regulations.

Phase II Administered by NYSDEC with two General Permits, MS4 Permit Applies to Certain Areas.

MS4 Program Responsibilities   Six Minimum Control Measures in the following order: 1,2,3,6,4,5.

1.  Public Education and Outreach.  2.  Public Participation and Involvement.  3.  Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination.  6.  Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations.  4.  Construction Site Runoff Control.  5.  Post-Construction Runoff Control.

Goal:  Keep and treat water on-site before discharging to local waterways.

How do we require these at the local level?  Use Stormwater Local Law - City of Beacon's Proposed law.  How can Beacon enhance the local law?

The following two Schedules A and B are taken from the fifteen page City of Beacon Local Law for Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control which can been seen in its entirety at the City Hall.

 

The following schedules A and B are two documents from the entire 15 page Local Law to amend the Zoning Law/Subdivision Law of the City of Beacon which can be seen in its entirety at the Beacon City Hall.

Schedule A

 

Stormwater Management Practices Acceptable for Water Quality (From: New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, Table 5.1)

Group

Practice

Description

Pond

Micropool Extended Detention Pond (P-l)

Pond that treats the majority of the water quality volume through extended detention, and incorporates a micropool at the outlet of the pond to prevent sediment resuspension.

 

 

Wet Pond (P-2)

Pond that provides storage for the entire water quality volume in the permanent pool.

 

 

Wet Extended Detention Pond (P-3)

Pond that treats a portion of the water quality volume by detaining storm flows above a permanent pool for a specified minimum detention time.

 

 

Multiple Pond System (P-4)

A group of ponds that collectively treat the water quality volume.

 

 

Pocket Pond (P-5)

A Stormwater wetland design adapted for the treatment of runoff from small drainage areas that has little or no baseflow available to maintain water elevations and relies on groundwater to maintain a permanent pool.

Wetland

Shallow Wetland (W-l)

A wetland that provides water quality treatment entirely in a shallow marsh.

 

 

Extended Detention Wetland (W-2)

A wetland system that provides some fraction of the water quality volume by detaining storm flows above the marsh surface.

 

 

Pond/Wetland System (W-3)

A wetland system that provides a portion of the water quality volume in the permanent pool of a wet pond that precedes the marsh for a specified minimum detention time.

 

 

Pocket Wetland (W-4)

A shallow wetland design adapted for the treatment of runoff from small drainage areas that has variable water levels and relies on groundwater for its permanent pool.

Infiltration

Infiltration Trench (1-1)

An infiltration practice that stores the water quality volume in the void spaces of a gravel trench before it is infiltrated into the ground.

 

 

Infiltration Basin (1-2)

An infiltration practice that stores the water quality volume in a shallow depression before it is infiltrated into the ground.

 

 

Dry Well (1-3)

An infiltration practice similar in design to the infiltration trench, and best suited for treatment of rooftop runoff.

Filtering Practices

Surface Sand Filter (F-l)

A filtering practice that treats Stormwater by settling out larger particles in a sediment chamber, and then filtering Stormwater through a sand matrix.

 

 

Underground Sand Filter (F-

2)

A filtering practice that treats Stormwater as it flows through underground settling and filtering chambers.

 

 

Perimeter Sand Filter (F-3)

A filter that incorporates a sediment chamber and filter bed as parallel vaults adjacent to a parking lot.

 

 

Organic Filter (F-4)

A filtering practice that uses an organic medium such as compost in the filter in place of sand.

 

 

Bioretention (F-5)

A shallow depression that treats Stormwater as it flows through a soil matrix, and is returned to the storm drain system.

Open Channels

Dry S wale (O-l)

An open drainage channel or depression explicitly designed to detain and promote the filtration of Stormwater runoff into the soil media.

 

 

Wet Swale (O-2)

An open drainage channel or depression designed to retain water or intercept groundwater for water quality treatment.

 

 

Schedule B

SAMPLE STORMWATER CONTROL FACILITY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

 

Whereas, the Municipality of____ ("Municipality") and the__________ ("facility owner") want to enter into an agreement to provide for the long term maintenance and continuation of stormwater control measures approved by the Municipality for the below named project, and

Whereas, the Municipality and the facility owner desire that the stormwater control measures be built in accordance with the approved project plans and thereafter be maintained, cleaned, repaired, replaced and continued in perpetuity in order to ensure optimum performance of the components. Therefore, the Municipality and the facility owner agree as follows:

1.   This agreement binds the Municipality and the facility owner, its successors and assigns, to the maintenance provisions depicted in the approved project plans which are attached as Schedule A of this agreement.

2.   The facility owner shall maintain, clean, repair, replace and continue the stormwater control measures depicted in
Schedule A as necessary to ensure optimum performance of the measures to design specifications. The stormwater control measures shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: drainage ditches, swales, dry wells, infiltrators, drop inlets, pipes, culverts, soil absorption devices and retention ponds.

3.   The facility owner shall be responsible for all expenses related to the maintenance of the stormwater control measures
and shall establish a means for the collection and distribution of expenses among parties for any commonly owned
facilities.

4. The facility owner shall provide for the periodic inspection of the stormwater control measures, not less than once in every five-year period, to determine the condition and integrity of the measures.  Such inspection shall be performed by a Professional Engineer licensed by the State of New York. The inspecting engineer shall prepare and submit to the Municipality within 30 days of the inspection, a written report of the findings including recommendations for those actions necessary for the continuation of the stormwater control measures.

5.   The facility owner shall not authorize, undertake or permit alteration, abandonment, modification or discontinuation of
the stormwater control measures except in accordance with written approval of the Municipality.

6.   The facility owner shall undertake necessary repairs and replacement of the stormwater control measures at the direction of the Municipality or in accordance with the recommendations of the inspecting engineer.

7.   The facility owner shall provide to the Municipality within 30 days of the date of this agreement, a security for the maintenance and continuation of the stormwater control measures in the form of ( a Bond, letter of credit or escrow account).

8. This agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the County Clerk, County of      together with the deed for the common property and shall be included in the offering plan and/or prospectus approved pursuant to _____.

9.  If ever the Municipality determines that the facility owner has failed to construct or maintain the stormwater control measures in accordance with the project plan or has failed to undertake corrective action specified by the Municipality or by the inspecting engineer, the Municipality is authorized to undertake such steps as reasonably necessary for the preservation, continuation or maintenance of the stormwater control measures and to affix the expenses thereof as a lien against the property.

10.  This agreement is effective_ .

 

Revaluation / Reassessment - Kathy Martin, Assessor

 

John Watch, MJW Consulting, Inc and Beacon Tax Assessor Kathy Martin gave a short presentation. 

 

Mr. Watch shared a copy of an actual bill of a reassessment for a resident in another county where the tax was reduced.  Not all taxes will be reduced.  Some will go up.  The reassessment does not raise one extra dollar of tax revenue.  It is critical that everyone understand this.  It is structurally designed to make sure all property owners are paying their fair share.  Over the last 20 years the city has gone through growth and revitalization that includes new construction and housing development.  Different parts of the city have appreciated.  Over time as the market changed and as people bought and sold homes some taxes ultimately varied greatly for similar properties.  Through the years, because of these changes, some homeowners are now paying either too much or not paying enough.  When a property owner looks down the street at a house which is exactly like his and discovers that the other house is paying a lot less tax than he pays, he has the right to have this corrected.  If your house is better than the one next door, it will be worth a lot more.  The assessor does not set the tax level.  His job is to make sure everyone pays their fair share.  Star exemptions are set by the state.  If you have any questions, please call the toll free number (866) 814-7114 and someone will call you back in a short time.  The reassessment will go into effect July 1, 2007

 

Building Department - Amend Chapter 119 of the City Code to Reflect Changes in the State Code Administration Law.  The following is a memo addressed to Joseph Braun from Tim Dexter dated December 13, 2006.

 

The Department of State has revised 19NYCRR Part 1203, which addresses the minimum standards for the administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code for each municipality throughout the State. Each community must provide for administration and enforcement of the Uniform Code by local law. Part 1 203 sets minimum program requirements that must be included in the local law. In order to comply with this requirement we must amend Chapter 119 of the City Code to reflect the changes outlined in the attached law. The attached proposed local law was based from a sample provided from the Department of State.

There are many new requirements, which will require more record keeping, administrative duties and actual field inspections. Many of the changes that are found in the proposed law simply codify how we currently do business. There are three changes that are noteworthy.

         The ability for us to issue Temporary Certificates of Occupancy, which is currently not permitted.

         The requirement for us to inspect all structures other than one and two family homes within our community in intervals that is consistent with local conditions not to exceed three years. What this means is we will be required to inspect every store, office and other commercial buildings at least every three years.

     The requirement for operating permits (Section 10) for certain types of occupancies such as buildings containing one or more areas of public assembly with an occupant load of 100 persons or more. This will require places like churches, clubs (K. of C., Elks, fire companies) with areas for 100 persons or more to obtain an operating permit. The operating permit will require an inspection by the department prior to issuance. I recommend the council consider establishing a fee to cover our costs to issue operating permits.

The minimum State standards are effective January 1, 2007. I know that we will not be able to adopt our revised local law for the administration and enforcement by that time so I would request that we place the law on the agenda for the first workshop in January for discussion.

 

Speaker:  Tim Dexter:  This is something that is mandated by the state and the minimum standards that our city must have.  The state gives us the building fire codes and this council sets the guidelines by local law.  I worked on this law with City Attorney Pisanelli and took those requirements and put them together in one document.  There is a section that explains that we have to establish an office or a person.  As noted in my memo to Joe Braun, above, there are three areas of importance.  The biggest one is the operating permit.  This will include primarily organizations that include more than 100 people.  The council asked me to notify all the people who would have to have an operating permit.  There are twenty-seven parcels that fall under this category.  We sent them a letter informing them of the change.  I would like to recommend that there be an annual fee.  This should be best managed by us.  Depending on how long and how bad a place is should determine the fee.  It is up to the local law to set a fee and the duration.  If there is a violation, we can suspend or revoke the permit depending on the violation.  We should not issue a permit until all violations are corrected.  Most of the churches are in compliance.  I think one year is better than three years.  This helps us to determine the people who do not need us anymore.  At the present time, we have to inspect any place where there is assembly of people each year.  If a permit expires and it had not been inspected, technically you cannot operate.  If you are in violation, you can be charged up to $1000.00 a day.

 

Council Member Kyriacou:  Annually is too frequent.  We might consider giving yearly inspections only to those who are creating a problem. 

Tim Dexter:  I make my recommendations based on my 20 years experience with the city.  We are allowed to charge a fee for operating permits.  I can put together a schedule very quickly on what should be charged.

Council Member Gold:  Unless we charge everyone, we should not charge these people. 

Tim Dexter:  An overwhelming majority of places cooperate.  I know immediately if I am dealing with a smart aleck.  Most are reasonable.  We can discuss fees further later in the year.  Almost every other community charges fees.  We do not charge any fees for annual fire inspections.

 

Consensus vote that we change the law with no fees.  Yearly Inspection:  4 votes for once a year with no fees and 3 votes for every three years with no fees.

 

List of Priorities - Council List of Priorities for the year.  Since there would be a shortage of time, Mayor Clara Lou Gould asked that the council members give her their priorities on the list of Pending Workshops.

 

Proposed Local Law to Amend Chapter 17 Conservation Advisory Commission, Section 17-3 Membership to Allow Alternates. § 17-3. Membership. [Amended 2-21-1995 by L.L. No. 1-1995]

 

The Commission shall consist of seven members who shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the advice and consent of the City Council.  The first four appointees shall serve two-year terms, and the final three appointees shall serve for one year.  Successors of all seven initial appointees shall serve two-year terms.  Persons residing within the City of Beacon who are interested in the improvement and preservation of environmental quality shall be eligible for appointment as members of the Commission. The Mayor may appoint not more than two persons between the ages of 16 and 21 years to the Commission. Vacancies on the Commission shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment, except that a vacancy occurring other than by the expiration of a member's term of office shall be filled only for the remainder of the unexpired term.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould::  We have a CAC in place right now.  If we allowed alternate members, we can also have a couple of people on those committees. They would be ready to take over.  Jerry, can we do that?

 

City Attorney Pisanelli:  In the description, you are supposed to advise the Planning Board.  This should go through a workshop.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould::  This will be put on the agenda for a workshop on February 13, 2007 and also the Planning Board will be advised.

 

Vacant Buildings:  See attached Code from the City of Newburgh regarding Buildings, Vacant from L. Foster email dated 1/8/07.  A copy of Newburgh's Law is included in the Council Member Foster's Comments of January 16, 2007.

 

Council Member Foster:  Several people asked what we can do about the vacant buildings in Beacon.  A couple of weeks ago someone mentioned that Newburgh has a law, which is in your packet.  I do think we need something for the buildings that have been vacant for so long.  These buildings have a negative impact on our city.  We need something that makes the building owners do something to make them look more attractive as well as safe.  When asked if Tim Dexter inspects vacant buildings.  Tim Dexter replied that he does not unless he gets a complaint.

Tim Dexter: If there are no violations and you have the doors locked, it follows the code.

Council Member Gold:  Can Jerry research this for us?  There is a law where plywood needed to be painted when it covered a window. 

Tim Dexter:  We inspect vacant buildings only periodically.  I do not like those buildings because people break into them and can start a fire.

Council Member Foster:  Can't we inspect a building for lack of occupancy?

Tim Dexter:  If the council is in favor of this Newburgh law, we can adopt the same law. It is very comprehensive.  Beacon Terminal owns a lot of the vacant buildings in town but they are very responsible.

Council Member Foster:  Is it possible to get the vacant buildings registered and inspected and if they do not comply can we charge them a fee?

Council Member Kyriacou:  I am not sure that the negative works. 

Council Member Foster:  At a minimum, can we start inspecting them? 

Tim Dexter:  The Newburgh law is comprehensive and well thought out.  Do we want to adopt it?  They spent a lot of time putting this together.

Council Member Kelly:  Regarding Liz's problem, I fear unintended consequences.  This may burden people that we do not want to burden.  Can you look at whom this may affect?

Council Member Foster:  Can this be for a business or storefront areas only?

Council Member Kyriacou:  What if it was focused on Main Street?  We might be able to do the modest requirements.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould:  As a first step, the mayor asked Tim to review the Newburgh Law and report back t the council.

 

Glenford Avenue - Paper Street – Access

Council Member Gold requested that Mrs. Hughes be allowed to voice her problem at this time.

 

City Administrator, Joseph Braun:  Right now there are two other driveways across the easement on the paper street.

Mrs. Hughes:  I asked that the snow be plowed from the Paper Street so I can get into my driveway. 

City Administrator, Joseph Braun:  Addressed the Council:  If we plow one driveway, we will have to do it for everyone.  If she wants to extend her driveway, we can give her an easement, which would solve her problem and not cost her anything. 

Mrs. Hughes said that at the time she built her house, her only option was to put her driveway into the paper street.  She wants to purchase the property because she is concerned that if she accepted an easement, the city may take it back because she was told that the easement is revocable.  The city may not want to sell this property in the event that a street will be constructed in the future

Council Member Kyriacou:  An easement on a deed cannot be revoked.  I propose that we send a letter to the other two owners to ask if they would like to purchase the piece of property that is in front of their property.  If she accepted the easement, it would solve her problem and will not cost her anything. 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould::  Do we have the wording for an easement?

City Attorney Pisanelli:  It will be put in writing so Mrs. Hughes can see it.

Council Member Kyriacou suggested that it be drafted for all the affected owners and told Mrs. Hughes that she may want to have her attorney to look at.

 

Special Use Permit     See revised Amended Special Use Permit for 1203 North Avenue (Karen Palumbo).

 

Council Member Kelly:  I would like to go over this request so it is clear in my mind.  It first came to us for offices on the first floor.  The problem was that it required eight parking spaces.  Her variance was denied.  She came back and sought approval for one office space.  After that approval she discovered that she was in the historical district.  Because of that, she was able to get a Special Use Permit for her original request.

Tim Dexter said that the variance would be granted.

City Attorney Pisanelli:  It is a big improvement to the neighborhood.

 

This will be placed on the agenda for a Public Hearing on February 5, 2007

 

Grant Writer - Authorize Mayor to sign Proposal with Susan Roeller Brown for Grant Writing Services.

 

This will be put on the agenda for February 5, 2007

 

Council Member Gold:  The way I read this she will provide from 3 to 6 applications which may take up to 250 hours at a cost of $75.00 per for a total of $18,000.00.

 

City Administrator, Joseph Braun:  Hopefully, the amount that she may bring in should surpass that amount.  The contract is only for one year and if her performance is not satisfactory, we will not renew the contract.

 

This will be on the council meeting agenda for February 5, 2007

 

Spring Valley Street - Reconstruction Issues.  See correspondence dated 1/17/07 from Lanc and Tully, along with map.

 

The following is a letter to Joseph Braun from Lanc & Tully Engineering and Surveying, P.C. dated January 17, 2007 regarding Spring Valley Street Reconstruction Issues:

 

Dear Mr. Braun:

Our office is currently working on the plans for the reconstruction of Spring Valley Street between Wolcott Avenue and East Main Street. As previously discussed, it is the city's intention to have sidewalk along one side of the road for pedestrian traffic flow between this area and Main Street. With this in mind, we have concerns with regards to the section between Union Street and Wolcott Avenue. The first concern is that at present, the road has a concrete retaining wall located on the North Side of the road, with several homes located below this wall. These homes do not have driveways, and it appears that the cars are parking on the south side of Spring Valley Street, where sidewalk is either non-existent, or is at grade with the road and is in a poorly deteriorated state. With the installation of curbing and sidewalks on the south side of the road, this would either require that the residents of the homes below the wall park in the road, or find alternative parking areas and walk to their homes. If the sidewalk was constructed at grade with the road, people could park there vehicles as they currently do, but this would block the passage of pedestrians on the sidewalk, and would require that they walk within the road with traffic, which is a safety concern.

The second concern is with the installation of a typical 24-foot wide road, with sidewalks and curbs, along the south side of the road. Along this section of Spring Valley Street there are numerous retaining walls and driveways with existing grades ranging from 17% to 22%. With the installation of a 24-foot wide road and sidewalks, this will impact several of the driveways by making their existing grade even steeper. It will also require the removal and relocation of several existing retaining walls, in turn driving up the cost of the reconstruction project. The enclosed plans show several alternatives our office has looked at in order to reconstruct this section of road without impacting the existing driveway grades, and allowing for the installation of sidewalks. The alternatives look at road widths of 23 feet wide with sidewalks, to 20-foot wide road widths with sidewalks.

               At this time we would ask that the City Council weigh in on the layout of this section of the road, to determine as to how the reconstruction of this section of road should proceed noting the two concerns expressed above. We have also included a copy of the proposed reconstruction layout proposed for Spring Valley Street between Union Street and East Main Street. This section of the road will be reconstructed with a 24 to 26 foot wide pavement width, and sidewalks along both sides of the road, with the exception of a section between Water Street and Churchill Street.

 

The street cannot handle sidewalks on both sides of the street.  My recommendation is that we use the area off street 9D.  Sidewalks will not work on Spring Valley Street.  If you look at the street map, you will see that it doesn't work.  I suggest that the council go out and take a look at this street.  One suggestion was to make it one way.

 

Byrne Grant:  The following memo addressed to City Administrator, Joseph Braun from Helen Sullivan of the City of Beacon Police Department dated January 25, 2007: