Minutes

City of Beacon Council Meeting

March 20, 2006

 

REGULAR MEETING

 

The regular meeting of the Beacon City Council held at the Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza on March 20, 2006 was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Clara Lou Gould with the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and a prayer by Rev. Tony Beck, Pastor of Christ Methodist Church.

 

The Mayor asked for a Moment of Silence for Charles DelBene, Jr.

 

Council Members Present:                   Lee Kyriacou, Elizabeth Foster, Charles Kelly, Phil Shea, Steve Gold and Eleanor Thompson.

 

Also Present were:                               City Administrator, Joseph Braun

                                                            City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli

                                                            Patrick LaRow from the office of Frederick P. Clarke Associates

                                                           

Media Represented by:                        Goldee Greene, Beacon Free Press

 

Residents at Beginning of Meeting:      40

 

Public Hearings:

 

1.  Proposed Local Law Adding Landmarks and Historic Districts to the Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone in Accordance with Chapter 134, Historic Preservation, of the City Code.  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, March 20, 2006 at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider a proposed local law which would add certain landmarks and historic districts to the Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone in accordance with Chapter 134, Historic Preservation of the City Code. This local law would take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State. Complete copies of the proposed local laws are available at the Municipal Center for inspection during regular business hours. All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Hearing Comments:

 

Pastor James H. Edgar, Moderator of Session:  I am asking that our building not be included in the Historic Overlay. We are not a historical building.  This building was built in 1947-1948.  I have letters reflecting this request.

 

The following letter from Pastor James H Edgar, First Presbyterian Church of Beacon regarding the City Historical District addressed to the Beacon City Council dated March 20, 2006 was placed in the record:

 

This letter is to request the removal of the properties of the First Presbyterian Church, (Tax ID #6054‑30‑217764: 50 Liberty Street; Tax ID #6054‑30‑221776: 39 Leonard Street), from the tax rolls. This unanimous action, communicated by this letter, was taken by the Governing Board of the First Presbyterian Church, meeting Sun­day, March 19, 2006.

 

It may be noted that the Church was not consulted about the inclu­sion of its property in a proposed Historical District of the City. After careful reading of the local law adopted by the Council on October 21, 1991, which was available through the Planning Office, members of our Governing Board believe the proposed action would only increase the expense of property maintenance, (i.e.: the number of licenses required).

 

The Governing Body of the District has asked churches not to be in­cluded in historical districts due to its experience.

 

We would appreciate a confirmation of this communication. Thank you.

 

Steven Evans:  The following Email addressed to Mayor Clara Gould and Council Members City of Beacon City Hall, One Municipal Plaza ,Beacon, NY 12508 from Jennifer Van Tuyl, Cuddy & Feder LLP dated March 20, 2006 regarding Proposed additions to Historic District/Overlay was read by Steven Evans, Dia Art Foundation, Assistant Director for Beacon:

 

I submit these comments on behalf of Dia: Beacon, to oppose its inclusion in the Landmark Overlay zone.

 

First, the inclusion is unnecessary. The Dia property is already on the National Register, and subject to the highest possible standards of review. Moreover, the work done at Dia has established beyond any doubt that the restoration and maintenance of the property continues to be done at the highest possible level.

 

Second, the inclusion would cause great hardship. Dia's interior, unlike most properties in the overlay zone, is open to the public. Because of this, Dia would be subject to a far more intrusive level of review and scrutiny under the law than virtually all the other properties in the City. Section 134‑4 exempts all properties from review of interior renovations, except properties where interior spaces are open to the public. This provision, therefore, would place a difficult and totally unnecessary burden on the facility.

           

I respectfully request that the Dia property be omitted from the proposed Landmark Overlay zone.

 

Thank you for this opportunity to comment.

 

The following is from Steven Evans to David Stolman with a copy to City Administrator, Joseph Braun dated March 20, 2006:

 

David: Thanks so much for sending the information. I also went to look at the proposed HD & LOZ map at the Planning Department today.

 

I will be coming to City Council tonight. I have reservations regarding including Dia's land marked building in the district/zone; it seems to be redundant to add yet another layer of administration in lieu of our already granted historic status and review process. I am also very concerned about the language in 134‑4 regarding interior changes; as a dynamic museum with constantly changing exhibition needs, seeking historic approval (beyond building permits) for interior walls adds undue hardship and restriction.

 

I suggest we remove Dials parcel from the proposed additions to the Beacon Historic District, especially in light of our National Register status and our good standing and relationship(s) with both the City of Beacon Planning Board and Building Department.

 

See you this evening,

 

Margery Groten, Scenic Hudson – Scenic Hudson requests that Long Dock be excluded.  We received the notification last week.  The development is undergoing a full SEQR review.  We feel that this is an unfortunate time for this review to occur.  We are concerned that the development will be affected by this decision.   We ask that Scenic Hudson be excluded from the Historic Overlay Zone.

 

The following letter addressed to Mayor Clara Lou Gould and City Council Members dated March 20, 2006 was entered into the record:

 

SCENIC HUDSON - Long Dock

 

Re:   Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone Dennings Avenue

Dear Mayor Gould and Council Members:

 

The Scenic Hudson Land Trust, Inc. (SHLT) and Foss Group Beacon LLC (FGB) respectfully request that the above referenced parcels on the Beacon waterfront, owned by SHLT, be excluded from the proposed expanded Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone. Scenic Hudson notes that we did not receive notification of the proposed inclusion of our properties in the expanded district before the first reading of the law, and were notified less than a week before the second reading.

 

The development of the parcels is currently undergoing a full coordinated SEQR review. The project under review reflects SHLT's and FGB's many years of work with the community and the City on the development of the City's Waterfront Development Zone.

 

For FGB, in our ongoing work to structure the equity, mortgage and subsidized capital sources for the commercial project, this additional level of approval will create a new uncertainty for potential participants at a crucial period in the development of the project.

 

Leaving the Long Dock Beacon parcels out of the expanded Historic District is no less protective of the environment and historic resources because Long Dock Beacon is undergoing a full and thorough environmental review, which includes historic resource assessment. During and after SEQR both the Council and the Planning Board will consider required environmental findings and permits.

 

The only old building on the property is the barn. Scenic Hudson has spent over $200,000 to stabilize and rehabilitate the structure and is working on plans to fit the building up to house a boat‑building program. While it is SHLT's intention to respect the barn's historic appearance, leave it in its current location, and maintain it for public use, the historic district restrictions may make it difficult to adapt it for the intended use. There are no other historic resources on the properties.

 

The City of Beacon is undertaking a laudable planning effort, which includes the comprehensive planning process and the harbor management planning process. How does the proposed Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone relate to these important initiatives?

 

We applaud the City's interest in protecting its historic infrastructure. However, the implications for the Long Dock property would work against achieving the vision which has been arrived at through the long community planning and development process which has gotten us all to this point.

 

We thank you for your consideration of this matter.

 

Sincerely, Margery Groten, Senior Land Project Manager and Matthew D. Rudikoff, Partner Foss Group Beacon, LLC

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould read the following letter from Dutchess County Department of Planning and Development, addressed to the Council dated March 20, 2006:

 

To: City Council, City of Beacon

 

Re: Referral: 06-088, Local Law Adding Landmarks and Historic Districts

The Dutchess County Department of Planning & Development has reviewed the subject referral within the framework of General Municipal Law (Article 12B, Section 239-1 and 239-m).  After considering the proposed action in the context of countywide and intermunicipal factors, the Department finds that the Board's decision involves a matter of some concern

 

Action

 

The City is proposing to a list of add landmarks and historic districts to its Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone.

District and Landmark Overlay Zone.

Comments

 

We have no general objections to additional historic properties in the City's overlay zone, if the property owners and neighborhood have been given proper notice and the ability to provide public comments.

 

The individual listing that initially raises questions is the Long Dock property, which includes the red barn but no other surviving historic structures. This is the only land on the entire Beacon riverfront that has been designated in the zoning law for waterfront development. We have suggested in the past that mixed-use development on Long Dock would be both consistent with the LWRP and Waterfront Development zoning district and most appropriate, given its unique location for transit-oriented development in close walking distance to the rail station. The Council should make sure that this historic designation does not diminish the types of development encouraged by the LWRP and zoning.  Similar questions should be considered in relation to Denning's Point and the plans for the Beacon Institute.

 

Recommendation

 

The Department Recommends that the Board rely upon its own study of the facts in the case with due consideration of the above comments-

 

Roger P. Akeley, Commissioner

Dutchess County Department of Planning & Development by:

John Clarke, Development and Design Coordinator

John Clarke

Development and Design Coordinator                     Linda Williamson, 16 South Street: Re:  The letter I received.  I was surprised to receive this notice.  I don't know if I am for or against it.  I have no idea what this code is.  I just want to be on the record that I responded to the letter.  I hope that whatever decision is made, it is to the benefit of my building.

 

Walter Castle, 17 North St.:  My house is old and has been resided many times.  Other things were done to make the house more attractive even though it was built in 1935.  Many other houses in Beacon have been changed and have only a marginal amount of historic detail and very little if any historic value.  Mr. Castle named many other locations that may or may not have historic value.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould:  The selection of the buildings was made by the historical society.

 

Maryanne Magagnos, 47 North Street:  If I do not meet with the planning board’s requirements, will I have to change anything that I have on my property?  Answer from the council:  No.

 

Linda Miller Tomlins, 48 South St.: When I moved to Beacon, the house was in disrepair.  I put on a new roof last year. I have been told that you cannot have vinyl siding on a historic building.  If I have to make changes, where will I get this money?  When I moved in six years ago, my house was 94 years old.

 

Anne West, 57 Dutchess Terrace: Regarding the buildings I do know what the code is.

 

Council Member Thompson:  This is something that we need to table and take back to workshop

 

Neil Larson:  I am a historic preservation consultant.  I represent Kim and John Lawrence.  Their property is on Slocum Road (Peter Dubois House) and is proposed for landmark status.  – I want offer my support and the owners support this designation as well.

 

Tom Baldino: I live in a house built by factory workers.  The house deteriorated very badly and someone came along and put siding on it.  There are no remaining original window frames.  They were replaced by Anderson Windows.  When I first came to Beacon, I knew my house was very old.  It was not considered important enough to be a part of the Overlay Zone.  I hope it does not cost me a lot of money.  I put solar panels on the roof.  I am proud to be in the Overlay Zone.

 

No further comments

 

Motion to Adjourn Public Hearing to April 3, 2006:  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Kelly.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Council Member Gold:  I suggest that we take this up at our next workshop on March 27, 2006.

 

2.  Special Use Permit Application for a new two family dwelling at 40 Vail Avenue submitted by Louis Amoroso.  Read by City Administrator Joseph Braun.

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Council of the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, March 6, 2006 at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider a Special Use Permit Application submitted by Louis Amoroso for a new two-family dwelling at 40 Vail Avenue, identified on City tax maps as Section 6054, Block 46, Lot 210559. The Beacon Planning Board reviewed the application on February 14, 2006 and recommends that the Special Use Permit be issued subject to the applicant returning to the Planning Board for final site plan review and that the members of the City Council assure themselves that the parking standards of the City of Beacon are being met. A copy of the proposal is available for inspection at the Municipal Center, Lower Level, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York during regular business hours (Monday-Friday ~ 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Betty DiPompo:  I cannot believe that so much time is being spent regarding a resident that wants to build a two family house.  I cannot understand the holdup.  Please allow him to build his two family house.  It has already been approved.

 

Louis Amoroso:  The property in question is mine.  The zoning and planning board have passed this with no restrictions. Recently my councilman came to my house and canvassed the area.  I had already done that.  In the neighborhood where I live there are 27 homes and out of the 27, 10 are two family even though it is zoned one family.  I have not asked for anything special.  I have lived here for years and would not do anything to hurt Beacon.  There are many houses that are not in compliance with the fire code.  My house will be in compliance.  I will be living in this house.

 

Flora Jones: I was at the planning board meeting when Mr. Amoroso was told that he could go to the council.  I was totally confused with that process.  I would like this council to agree to have Mr. Amoroso have his permission.  This man is a decent man with a decent family.  I am angry how this family is being treated.

 

Anne West: I did not buy my house until I was fifty.  Beacon consists of two family homes and it should continue this way.

 

Angelo Pomerico, 88 Prospect St.: This proposal for a special use permit should have gone to the planning board first.  In order to streamline the process, he was sent to the zoning board first.  The same zoning board ruled against a one family house one block away.  If you approve a two family in a one family zone, what is to stop others from doing the same?  I see no reason to compromise the building codes.

 

Dennis Walden, 9 Miller St. - I am in favor of Mr. Amoroso’s request.  I think we should applaud Mr. Amoroso for providing affordable housing.  There are many homes in Beacon that are run down and have absentee owners.  Mr. Amoroso plans to live in this house and I know he will take special care of his property.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould read letter from Dennis Pavelock into the record:

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

I am writing this letter to voice my approval for Louie Amoroso to put a two family house on his back lot of his property.

 

At the last workshop the words "in Harmony" were mentioned.

 

Now I'd like to talk about the historic overlay district on 9D.

 

To my understanding, if the residents want to make structural changes, they need a Special Use Permit and or a variance.  They can't go against the Historic nature.  And in return, residents can do a Bed and Breakfast and/or a Restaurant.  My point here is the Historic Overlay on 9D.  How many restaurants and how many Bed and Breakfasts can be next to each other. Is this "In Harmony"?

 

So there are 30% of two family homes in the neighborhood.  Is one more going to make it out of Harmony?

 

Meg Rasmussen: I would like to say that the Amorosos are good neighbors and their property is impeccable.  But what would happen if they sell it?  We should pay attention to the issue of two family zoning.  This property is zoned one family and we should keep it that way.  I know that Lou will keep his property up beautifully but we should keep in mind the fact this property is zoned one family.

 

Nicole Golay: I agree with everything that Meg said.  The reason I picked this area is because of the big open lots.

 

No further comments

 

Motion to close Public Hearing:  Council Member Thompson. Seconded:  Council Member Gold.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Community Segment:            Renewable Energy  - Keith Christensen - He showed a short film on renewable energy.  He then showed slides on Oil, Coal Mercury Contamination, air pollution impacts, NYS Power Plants, and Wind Power, Fastest Growing Energy Source taking off Worldwide, Price Set to Rival Conventional Power, Turbine Size and Emissions Impact, Who is Community Energy,

 

Anyone who is interested in a tour of the facilities is welcome.  Mr. Christensen can be reached at Community Energy, Phone No. 845-454-2113, Email:  Keith.Christensen@NewWindEnergy.com

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould asked for a motion to approve the following Council Meeting Minutes:

 

March 6, 2006

 

Motion to approve minutes:  Council Member Gold.  Seconded:  Council Member Shea.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried

 

Text for the following reports for March 20, 2006 is at the end of these minutes:

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould's Communications

City Administrator, Joseph Braun's gave his Report of Activities

City Attorney Report of Activities is given at the 1st Meeting of the Month

Mayor Clara Lou Gould gave her report of Activities

Council Members gave their reports of Activities

 

Public Comments:  Pertaining to This Agenda Only

 

No comments

 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

 

1.  Resolution No. 28 of 2006 - Special Use Permit Application for a new two family dwelling at 40 Vail Avenue submitted by Louis Amoroso.  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

WHEREAS, Louis Amoroso has applied for a Special Use Permit from the City Council requesting approval for a new two-family dwelling; and

 

WHEREAS, the Planning Board has recommended the City Council issue said permit subject to final site plan approval by the Planning Board; and

 

1.         The location and size of the use, nature and intensity of the operations involved in such use, the size of the site in relation to it, and the location of the site with respect to streets giving access to it, are such that it would be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly development of the district in which it is located; and

 

2.         The location, nature and height of the buildings, walls and fences, together with the nature and extent of the landscaping of the site are such that the use will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings; and

 

3.  The operations in connection with the proposed new two-family dwelling are not more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibration or other characteristics, than would be the operation of any permitted use not requiring a special use permit; and

 

4.  Parking areas are of adequate size for the particular use, are properly located and the driveways are laid out to achieve maximum safety; and

 

5.  The City Council having assured itself that the parking standards of the City of Beacon are being met; and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application submitted by Louis Amoroso for a Special Use Permit is an action subject to the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council has the broadest powers to investigate the impact of the authorization for the proposed new two-family dwelling and since the Council has the capability to provide a thorough Environmental Assessment of the proposed action; and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that pursuant to §223-18D certain conditions and safeguards shall be attached, which conditions and safeguards shall run with the land, as follows:

 

A.  Owner Occupancy Required.  The owner of the lot upon which the two-family structure is located shall occupy at least one of the dwelling units on said lot;

 

B.  Exterior Appearance. The entry to such two-family building and its design shall be such that, to the degree reasonably feasible, the exterior appearance of the two-family building will remain that of a single-family residence.

 

C.  Renewal Inspection.  Each dwelling unit in the two-family building shall be inspected by the Building Department every two years in order to determine whether each dwelling unit remains in compliance with this section.  Upon a satisfactory inspection report, the two-family building shall be re-issued a Special Use Permit.  In the event that the inspection indicates that the two-family building is no longer in compliance, the Special Use Permit shall be revoked until the violations are cured;

Now, therefore, be it 

 

RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby declares itself lead agency under SEQRA relative to the application by Louis Amoroso for a Special Use Permit, and be it further

 

RESOLVED, that the City Council as lead agency under SEQRA, has reviewed the submitted Environmental Assessment Form and has determined that the proposed action is an unlisted action, and that the proposal will not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared, and be it further

 

RESOLVED, that a Special Use Permit be hereby issued pursuant to §223-18 of the City of Beacon Zoning Ordinance to Louis Amoroso subject to final site plan approval of the Planning Board in accordance with the following conditions:

 

A.  Owner Occupancy Required.  The owner of the lot upon which the two-family structure is located shall occupy at least one of the dwelling units on said lot;

 

B.  Exterior Appearance. The entry to such two-family building and its design shall be such that, to the degree reasonably feasible, the exterior appearance of the two-family building will remain that of a single-family residence.

 

C.  Renewal Inspection.  Each dwelling unit in the two-family building shall be inspected by the Building Department every two years in order to determine whether each dwelling unit remains in compliance with this section.  Upon a satisfactory inspection report, the two-family building shall be re-issued a Special Use Permit.  In the event that the inspection indicates that the two-family building is no longer in compliance, the Special Use Permit shall be revoked until the violations are cured.

 

Motion to approve Special Use Permit Application:  Council Member Kelly.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson.

 

Discussion:  Lee:  I would like the zoning board to come to a workshop to tell us what their reasoning was.

 

Comments by Council Member Gold regarding the Amoroso Special Use Permit:

This has been a difficult decision for me and one that kept me awake many nights. I want to address a few of the public comments made tonight.

Regarding making this decision a personal one, I and others on this council have tried to separate the applicant from the application. I have tried to make my decision objectively. However it is difficult to do because I respect Mr. Amoroso for all of the work he does for the city in the Fire Department and his public service when he ran for Mayor. But the decision must be made based on the impact the application has on the city.

Someone said that we were taking too much time to make our decision. To this I respond that this issue was complicated. It involved understanding the roles of the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals as well the evaluation we on the Council are required to take. It took time to sort all of this out.

Someone also talked about the process of obtaining a special use permit. Had he gone first to the Planning Board, according to the Dave Stolman, the City Planner, he would have been turned down because a two family house is not permitted in a single family zone. He would then have gone to the Zoning Board of Appeals. This is where the applicant actually went to first. In the opinion of the City Planner, when the applicant went to the ZBA, the application should have been rejected by the ZBA. Mr. Stolman stated that the required test was not performed by the ZBA to determine if the applicant had a financial hardship that made it a necessity for him to build a two family house in a single family neighborhood. When the ZBA gave its approval it was sent to the City Council for a special use permit. The test we on the council are supposed to apply is whether the two family house is in “harmony” with the development of the district. I choose to take a restricted view and believe that it is not in harmony because this is a single family zoned neighborhood. The fact that the two homeowners who live directly opposite the location where the house will be built are opposed is indication that the neighborhood should remain single family. Also, the applicant himself stated that 10 of the 27 homes within his area are two family homes. So this two family would contribute to a neighborhood that already has many two family homes.

The position I take to vote "no" on this application is not to be punitive to the applicant but to preserve the neighborhood.

 

On a roll call vote to approve Special Use Permit for Lou Amoroso: There were five "yes" votes and Council Member Shea and Gold voted "no".  On a vote of five in favor and two against, motion carried to approve Special Use Permit.

 

2.  Add the following two resolutions to correct real property tax bill of 6 Dutchess Terrace and 5 Colonial Road Apt. 37

 

Motion to add to Agenda:  Council Member Thompson.  Seconded:  Council Member Foster.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

3.  Resolution No. 29 for 2006 - Authorize the issuance of a Corrected Real Property Tax Bill of 6 Dutchess Terrace.

 

WHEREAS, the 2005 taxable assessed value of the real property located at 6 Dutchess Terrace, Grid No. 5955-83-816034, did not include senior-county and senior-town exemptions due to clerical error, and

 

WHEREAS, the amount levied for taxes was $1,856.55 which should have been $993.02, and

 

WHEREAS, the Dutchess County Real Property Tax Service and the Office of the Assessor recommends that the application for a corrected 2005/2006 County/City tax bill be approved,

 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the amount of $1,856.55 improperly billed to Nicholas J. Boonstra be withdrawn and a corrected tax bill in the amount of $993.02 be issued to Nicholas J. Boonstra, the owner of real property located at 6 Dutchess Terrace, and further be it

 

RESOLVED, that any interest and penalties attached to this bill in error be waived provided payment of the corrected bill is received within 30 days of the date of mailing the new corrected bill to the owner of 6 Dutchess Terrace, said  mailing to be documented by an affidavit of mailing.

 

Motion to issue corrected real property tax bill for 6 Dutchess Terrace:  Council Member Shea.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

4.  Resolution No. 30 for 2006 - Authorize the issuance of a corrected real property tax bill of 5 Colonial Road Apt. 37

 

WHEREAS, the 2005 taxable assessed value of the real property located at 5 Colonial Road, Grid No. 5955-19-643073, did not include veterans exemptions 41131 – Alt. Vets Combat and 41141 – Alt. Vets Disabled due to clerical error, and

 

WHEREAS, the amount levied for taxes was $537.91 which should have been $215.12, and

 

WHEREAS, the Dutchess County Real Property Tax Service and the Office of the Assessor recommends that the application for a corrected 2005/2006 County/City tax bill be approved,

 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the amount of $537.91 improperly billed to Chris Strigos be withdrawn and a corrected tax bill in the amount of $215.12 be issued to Chris Stigos, the owner of real property located at 5 Colonial Road, Apt. 37, and further be it

 

RESOLVED, that any interest and penalties attached to this bill in error be waived provided payment of the corrected bill is received within 30 days of the date of mailing the new corrected bill to the owner of 5 Colonial Road, Apt 37, said  mailing to be documented by an affidavit of mailing. 

 

Motion to issue corrected real property tax bill for 5 Colonial Rd, Apt. 37:  Council Member Kelly.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Local Laws and Ordinances:

 

1.  Adding Landmarks and Historic Districts to the Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone in Accordance with Chapter 134, Historic Preservation, of the City Code.  Second Reading.

 

    1. Adopt Negative Declaration in Connection with Proposed Local Law Adding Landmarks and Historic Districts to the Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone in Accordance with Chapter 134, Historic Preservation, of the City Code. 
    2. Adopt Proposed Local Law Adding Landmarks and Historic Districts to the Historic District and Landmark Overlay Zone in Accordance with Chapter 134, Historic Preservation, of the City Code. 

 

Motion to table until April 3, 2006:  Council Member Kelly.  Seconded:  Council Member Gold.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:   

 

1.  Resolution No. 31 of 2006 - Authorize Mayor to Proclaim May 7, 2006 as World Aids Orphans Day.

 

WHEREAS: The AIDS pandemic is relentlessly gaining ground, leaving millions of victims in its wake and orphaning a new child every 15 seconds;

 

WHEREAS: The AIDS Orphans' crisis is a humanitarian, economic, social and security challenge that our global society must urgently address, these children being among the most vulnerable of the planet;

 

WHEREAS: Only a large-scale and sustainable political effort can halt this crisis;

 

WHEREAS: World AIDS Orphans' Day contributes to raising public awareness about the plight of these children;

 

WHEREAS: Elected officials, guarantors of the Rights of the Child in their respective districts, can commit their constituencies to respecting the rights of the most vulnerable children;

 

WHEREAS: the moral support given by communities can contribute to influencing governments into taking immediate measures for the protection and global care taking of AIDS orphans, and subsequently respecting and applying the Rights of the Child

 

THEREFORE: I, Clara Lou Gould, Mayor of the City of Beacon, do hereby proclaim May 7, 2006

 

WORLD AIDS ORPHANS DAY

 

The city invites all of its citizens as well as the media to support this world solidarity coalition initiated by FXB.

 

May 7, 2006    

 

Motion to authorize:  Council Member Thompson.  Seconded:  Council Member Gold.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Local Laws And Ordinances:

 

1.  Resolution No. 32 of 2006 -:  Proposed Local Law Amending § 1-3 Entitled “General Penalty”.  Set Public Hearing for Monday, April 3, 2006.  First Reading Read: by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

Motion to set Public Hearing on April 3, 2006:  Council Member Shea.  Seconded:  Council Member Foster.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Ratifications: 

 

1.  Resolution No. 33 of 2006 - Ratifications for the following W.H. Mase Hook & Ladder:  Effective 03/07/06:

 

Thomas Ciralli – Ratify as New Active Member effective March 7, 2006

Michael Viserto – Ratify as New Jr. Active Member (Age 16) effective March 7, 2006

 

Motion to ratify:  Council Member Thompson.  Seconded:  Council Member Gold.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Appointments:

 

1.  Resolution No. 34 of 2006 - Recreation Commission - Reappointment