Minutes

City of Beacon Council Meeting

July 18, 2005

 

REGULAR MEETING

 

The regular meeting of the Beacon City Council held at the Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza on July 18, 2005 was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Clara Lou Gould with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

 

Council Members Present:                   Deanna Leake, Eleanor Thompson, Sam Way, Lee Kyriacou, Fred Antalek and Michael Fasano.

 

Excused:                                              City Administrator, Joseph Braun

 

Also Present:                                        City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli

 

Media represented by:                         Goldee Greene, Beacon Free Press

                                                           

Residents at beginning of meeting:      35       

 

Public Hearings:

           

1.  Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 223, Zoning, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to Artist Live/Work Spaces.  Read by Council Member Way.

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Council of the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 18, 2005 at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider a proposed local law amending Chapter 223, Zoning, of the City of Beacon Code with respect to artist live/work spaces. The intent and purpose of the amendment is to make the renewal inspection procedure for such spaces the same as for accessory apartments.

 

This local law would take effect immediately upon its filing with the Secretary of State. Complete copies of the proposed local law are available at the Municipal Center for inspection during regular business hours.

 

All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Hearing Comments:

 

The following Memorandum addressed to Mayor Clara Lou Gould and the City Council dated July 18, 2005 was received from Etha Grogan, Planning Board Secretary regarding Proposed Local Law amending Chapter 223-24.3.B – Artist Live/Work.  cc’s to:  City Administrator, Joseph Braun and City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli.

 

At the July 12, 2005 Planning Board meeting, the Board reviewed the proposed amendment to the Artist Live/Work law currently under consideration. After a lengthy review and discussion with City Planner David Stolman, members unanimously agreed that the amendment changing the renewal process made good planning sense, and recommended the City Council proceed with enacting the proposed legislation.

 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson Street - Does this obstruct, hinder or delay the artist’s plans in any way, shape or form?  I just want to see that everyone gets a fair shake.

 

Tim Dexter, Deputy Building Inspector - This was requested by a developer through his legal representation who suggested that it was onerous to keep having to go back through the city council.

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson Street - I just do not want to see what happened to 262 Beacon Street, which took so long to get approval.  I would like to see everyone treated on an even keel and get a fair shake.  The work should not be hindered delayed or obstructed.

 

City Attorney, Pisanelli referred to a letter from Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman, LLP, which suggested the following:  “Upon a satisfactory inspection report, the existing Certificate of Occupancy shall remain in full force….”  Do you want to amend this proposal to add this suggestion regarding Certificate’s of Occupancy?

 

Council Member Way:  I would suggest that we adjourn this public hearing to a future date in order to make this change.

 

Tim Dexter, Deputy Building Inspector - I would not object to an adjournment and rescheduling this hearing to make this change.  There is no urgency to this matter.

 

No further comments. 

 

Motion to adjourn hearing until August 1, 2005.  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

2.  Special Use Permit:  Application of Meadow Ridge Phase II Senior Housing Facility, Matteawan Road.  Read by Council Member Sam Way.

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Council of the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 18, 2005 at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider a Special Use Permit Application submitted by Hudson Valley Housing Development Fund Company, Inc. for a 52 Unit Senior Housing Facility at the Meadow Ridge II Site located off Matteawan Road.  A special use permit had been granted in April 2004, which has expired (Resolution No. 51 of 2004, April 5, 2004).

 

A copy of their proposal is available for inspection at the Municipal Center, Lower Level, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York during regular business hours (Monday-Friday ~ 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.)

 

All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Hearing Comments:

 

The following letter addressed to Mayor Clara Lou Gould and the City Council dated July 13, 2005 was received from Arthur J. Hibbs, Chairman of the Beacon Planning Board regarding Special Use Permit ‑ Meadow Ridge Phase 11 ‑ Senior Housing Facility Applicant: Hudson Valley Housing Development Fund Company, Inc.

 

A public hearing on a Special Use Permit application for a 52‑unit senior housing facility at the Meadow Ridge site located off Matteawan Road was held by the Planning Board on July 12, 2005.

 

The proposal has not changed since the original approval in April of 2004, therefore the Board voted to recommend the City Council issue a Special Use Permit with no need to return to the Planning Board. If you have any questions regarding the Planning Board's action, please call me.

 

Dennis Pavelock – At the July 12 Planning Board meeting that I attended there were two housing proposals and I know of two more.  Meadow Ridge, Tuck Tape, St. Francis Property, Bob’s Corner Store.  I suggest we take a look at our Master Plan before we go further.

 

Motion to close Public Hearing:  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

No further comments.

 

Community Segment:  None 

 

Approval of Minutes: Mayor Clara Lou Gould asked for a motion to approve Council Meeting for -           

 

                                                July 5, 2005

 

Motion to approve minutes:  Council Member  Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.   All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Reports:  Text from the reports for July 18, 2005 is at the end of these minutes.

 

Mayor’s Communications read by Mayor Clara Lou Gould

City Administrator’s Report of Activities – Read by Council Member Kyriacou

City Attorney Report of Activities – 1st Meeting of the Month

Mayor Clara Lou Gould read her Report of Activities

Council Members gave their Reports of Activities

 

Public Comments:  Pertaining to This Agenda Only

 

Ferdinand Metz - 5 Slocum Road.  I would like to express my opinion on the bridge project.  There is probably nothing that is being said here tonight is news to you.  I hope you will consider other options to preserve the integrity of the bridge.  I cannot see the advantage of the city trying to solve a traffic problem, because you will only create more of a problem.  I understand that if the bridge is a single lane, there will be a traffic backup.  The children will have no sidewalks to walk on.  The historic integrity of the bridge will not be preserved and the traffic problem will not be solved.  I urge the city council to consider those issues.

 

Tom Baldino:  I would like to speak on the same point.  If you want to preserve the historic integrity of the bridge, I would like it to be the same and used the same way that it was before it was closed. 

 

Michelle Humphreys read the following comments:

 

I reside in the Polo Field Development in Beacon and would like to state my views about the Tioronda Bridge.

I am strongly opposed to any kind of vehicular bridge whether it is one lane or a two-lane car bridge. The first reason I'm opposed to a vehicular bridge is my deep concern about an increase in traffic through our neighborhood. According to the engineers obtained by the city of Beacon, they estimate that 800 cars and trucks would travel over this bridge through Polo Field- a quiet, serene and residential neighborhood. I do believe that this many people would use the scenic roads of Slocum and South Ave as an alternate route if the bridge were made vehicular. It is like the saying, "if you build it, they will come". If this traffic pattern does occur through the Polo Field Development I believe that Beacon has ultimately damaged a gem of a neighborhood. The second reason I'm opposed to t he bridge is that by building a vehicular bridge, the historic Tioronda Bridge would be destroyed. This bridge, built in 1872 during the Civil War, holds great historic significance. As a city council person, if you support a vehicular bridge, you in essence are supporting the destruction of a national landmark. Just think about what this means!! To me, this means that you don't value history (especially Beacon's history), community, or the integrity of a beautifully, unique neighborhood. I believe you should take the higher road and support the preservation of the Tioronda Bridge. I am aware of the request for funding from Jo Braun to SHPO (State Historic Preservation Office) to provide 50 funding for a pedestrian/hiking bridge. I strongly support this and urge all of you to vote for the SHPO funding. By making the Tioronda a pedestrian/hiking bridge, you can refurbish a national landmark, allow easier access to Madam Brett State Park, and maintain the peace and serenity of a beautiful neighborhood.

 

The residents in Polo Field are a very large tax base for Beacon and are the /citizens that will be most affected by each of your decisions regarding the future of the Tioronda Bridge. . Most of the residents in Polo Field want a pedestrian/hiking bridge- if you chose to go ahead with a vehicular bridge, then you are not truly representing the residents of this community.

 

Linda DeBrita read the following comments:

 

My name Linda DiBrita and live with my husband and two small children.  I would like to say a few words about the Tioronda Bridge as my home, family and neighbors are directly affected by any changes that are to take place.

 

We are very glad to hear the Council has decided to forego a two lane vehicular bridge altogether.  However, we feel strongly that even a one lane vehicular bridge will still have an overwhelming negative impact on our neighborhood, environment and for many Beacon residents an historic landmark.

 

Perhaps a more suitable solution would be the further consideration of a pedestrian and bicycling bridge, which would serve the needs of the community and the people who visit Dutchess County as well as preserve the existing historic bridge.

 

We would strongly support the decision of the Mayor to file an application for NYS funding (SHPO) that is on tonight’s agenda to preserve the bridge.

 

Dennis Pavelock – 34 Judson Street – Found a letter dated Jan 16, 1990 and read it concerning the traffic on Howland Avenue and pending repair of the bridge at that time.

 

Steve Gold – I would like to say that I have been watching the newspaper and I want to commend the council for making a lot of good decisions.  When you look at this Tioronda Bridge I know what you are going through.  I know you have safety in mind at all times.  A couple of years from now we will look at that bridge and know that we saved a national treasure.  I think saving this bridge is one of the most important things that you can do for Beacon.

 

Dennis Swindell, 15 High Back Lane – Every one that spoke tonight has been very eloquent.  I would like to see this bridge turned into a pedestrian bridge in order to get to the other side.  There are so many people who would love to be here tonight but they were unable to come.  We do not want to destroy where we came from.  I would urge the council to preserve this bridge.

 

J. M. Hayes, - My idea is to restore the bridge so that it looks exactly as it did when it was brand new but we should strengthen it so that it can be used when needed in an emergency for emergency vehicles.  Maybe when you talk about this it will be something that you will consider.

 

Richard Marquis, 10 Slocum Road - The problem we are having with sewage - if there is an accident on that bridge you will create a problem that I do not think the city can afford.

 

Joan Van Voorhis – I have crossed that bridge eight times in my life and I never saw 800 cars.

 

Tim Nolan 300 South Ave – I want to speak in favor of preserving the Tioronda Bridge for Pedestrians.  Everything that I wanted to say has been said already.  It is very important that we try to preserve things in Beacon.  I urge you to apply for the SHIPO funding that is on the Agenda tonight. I don’t understand why we would consider an arterial.  We have an arterial and don’t need another one.  We do not need these 800 vehicles a day going over that bridge.

 

Suzanne Metz, Slocum Road – The only thing I want to add that on Slocum Road we have 80 homes going in.  These developments have young families with kids.  The historical value of the bridge is important to the people in that development.  This will add to their recreational space.

 

No further comments

 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

 

1.  Authorize Mayor to transfer $12,740 in Community Development Funds from Administration.

 

Council Member Kyriacou:  I have a point of order on this.  We voted this down and I don’t think Robert’s Rules will permit us to consider this again until certain steps are taken.  We have to go through the process from the beginning.  I think that someone who voted against it can raise it again but since I am the one who voted against it and do not intend to change my vote, this will have to go through the process again.

 

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli:  If this goes through another workshop, we will still have time to spend these funds in the allotted time.

 

This item will go back to Workshop.

 

No action taken.

 

Local Laws and Ordinances:

 

1.   Amending Chapter 223, Zoning, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to Artist Live/Work Spaces.  Second Reading:  Read by City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli.

 

Table until August 1, 2005:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

 

1.  Resolution No. 74 of 2005 - Set Public Hearing – 2006 Capital Plan Highlights – Monday, August 1, 2005.

 

Motion to set Public Hearing:  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.    

 

2.  Resolution No. 75 of 2005 - Approve Special Use Permit:  Application of Meadow Ridge Phase II Senior Housing Facility, Matteawan Road.  Read by City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli

 

WHEREAS, Meadow Ridge II – Senior Housing Facility received a Special Use Permit from the City Council for a fifty-two (52) unit Senior Housing Facility in April of 2004; and

 

WHEREAS, no construction has been started; and

 

WHEREAS, said Special Use Permit has expired; and

 

WHEREAS, Meadow Ridge Phase II – Senior Housing Facility has reapplied for a Special Use Permit from the City Council requesting approval for a fifty-two (52) unit Senior Housing Facility; and

 

WHEREAS, the Planning Board has recommended the City Council issue said new permit subject to final site plan approval by the Planning Board; and

 

1.         The location and size of the use, nature and intensity of the operations involved in such use, the size of the site in relation to it, and the location of the site with respect to streets giving access to it, are such that it would be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly development of the district in which it is located; and

 

            2.         The location, nature and height of the buildings, walls and fences, together with the nature and extent of the landscaping of the site are such that the use will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings; and

 

            3.         The operations in connection with the proposed fifty-two (52) unit Senior Housing Facility are not more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibration or other characteristics, than would be the operation of any permitted use not requiring a special use permit; and

 

            4.         Parking areas are of adequate size for the particular use, are properly located and the driveways are laid out to achieve maximum safety; and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application submitted by Meadow Ridge Phase II for a Special Use Permit is an action subject to the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council has the broadest powers to investigate the impact of the authorization for the proposed fifty-two (52) unit Senior Housing Facility and since the Council has the capability to provide a thorough Environmental Assessment of the proposed action, now, therefore, be it

 

RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby declares itself lead agency under SEQRA relative to the application by Meadow Ridge Phase II for a Special Use Permit, and be it further

 

RESOLVED, that the City Council as lead agency under SEQRA, has reviewed the submitted Environmental Assessment Form and has determined that the proposed action is an unlisted action, and that the proposal will not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared, and be it further

 

RESOLVED, that a new Special Use Permit be hereby issued to Meadow Ridge Phase II - Senior Housing Facility subject to final site plan approval of the Planning Board in accordance with the conditions set forth above pursuant to Section 223-18 of the City of Beacon Zoning Ordinance. 

 

Motion to approve Special Use Permit: Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Antalek.

On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

3.  Resolution No. 76 of 2005 - Authorize Mayor to apply for and to accept $507,500 in NYS Department of State Environmental Protection Funds to help fund the public amenities designed to attract and engage City residents and general public in activities on the boardwalk and civic plaza. (Long Dock Beacon Public Amenities) Read by Council Member Way.

 

WHEREAS, Scenic Hudson purchased 25 acres on the Beacon waterfront with the objective of improving public access to the Hudson River, restoring a degraded industrial property, and making connections to the rest of the City; and

 

WHEREAS, in response to Beacon's request to allow development on the waterfront in accordance with the City's LWRP and zoning code, Scenic Hudson is working with Foss Group Beacon to develop a 16‑acre park and 8.5‑acre mixed use development on that site; and

 

WHEREAS, the site plan includes a 660‑foot long public boardwalk and a 12,000‑square foot public plaza; and

 

WHEREAS, Scenic Hudson is committed to programming the boardwalk and civic plaza to create a welcoming feeling and to guarantee the site's public qualities, its feeling of safety and comfort; and

 

WHEREAS, Scenic Hudson will provide the entire match for the grant application;

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to apply for and to accept $507,500 in NYS Department of State Environmental Protection Funds to help fund the public amenities designed to attract and engage City residents and the general public in activities on the boardwalk and civic plaza.

 

Motion to Authorize Mayor to apply for and accept funds:  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

4.  Resolution No. 77 of 2005 - Authorize Mayor to file an application and accept funds from the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation in an amount not to exceed $350,000 for acquisition of ecologically sensitive open space.  Read by City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli.

 

RESOLVED, Clara Lou Gould, as Mayor of City of Beacon, is hereby authorized and directed to file an application for funds and accept funds from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation in accordance with the provisions of Title 9 of the Environmental Protection Act of 1993 or the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965, in an amount not to exceed $350,000, and upon approval of said request to enter into and execute a project agreement with the State for such financial assistance to this municipality, City of Beacon, for acquisition of ecologically sensitive open space.

 

Motion to Authorize Mayor to file application and accept funds:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

5.  Resolution No. 78 of 2005 - Authorize Mayor to file an application and accept funds from the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation in an amount not to exceed $200,000 to rehabilitate the historic Tioronda Bridge.

 

RESOLVED, Clara Lou Gould, as Mayor of City of Beacon, is hereby authorized and directed to file an application for funds and accept funds from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation in accordance with the provisions of Title 9 of the Environmental Protection Act of 1993 or the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965, in an amount not to exceed $200,000, and upon approval of said request to enter into and execute a project agreement with the State for such financial assistance to this municipality, City of Beacon, to rehabilitate the historic Tioronda Bridge.

 

Motion to authorize Mayor to file an application and accept funds:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

6.  Resolution No.79 of 2005 - Authorize Mayor to file an application and accept $325,000 from NYS Department of State Environmental Protection Funds to help fund the cost of Physical & Technological Outfitting and Program Buildout for their Public Outreach/Educational Efforts and Programming in “Building One” on Denning’s Point.  Read by Council Member Way.

 

Application for Environmental Protection Funds With the Department of State For Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, Year 2005 – 2006

 

Physical & Technological Outfitting and Program Buildout for their Public Outreach/Educational Efforts and Programming in “Building One” on Denning’s Point

 

WHEREAS, the Rivers and Estuaries Center has agreed to collaborate with the City of Beacon to apply for and accept funds from Department of State Environmental Protection Funds for the purpose of Physical & Technological Outfitting and Program Buildout for their Public Outreach/Educational Efforts and Programming in “Building One” on Denning’s Point; and

 

WHEREAS, the Rivers and Estuaries Center has agreed to provide the $345,000 in matching funds for a grant application to the Department of State to fund such a Physical & Technological Outfitting in “Building One” on Denning’s Point;

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to apply for and accept $325,000 in NYS Department of State Environmental Protection Funds to help fund the cost of Physical & Technological Outfitting and Program Buildout for their Public Outreach/Educational Efforts and Programming in “Building One” on Denning’s Point.

 

Motion to Authorize Mayor to file an application and accept funds:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

7.  Resolution No. 80 of 2005 – Authorize Mayor to approve the application submitted to D.C. Planning and Development Agency for Beacon - Façade Improvement Program – 2005 Application Cycle.  Read by City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli.

 

WHEREAS, the Mayor is authorized to approve the Beacon Facade Applications submitted by:

 

Property Address: 180 Main Street (1 Storefronts/ 2 residential units to be constructed)

Owner: 180 Main Street LLC (Shanna Abeles)

Total Cost: $26,000

Funding Request: $7,500.00

 

Property Address: 155 Main Street, Beacon (2 Storefronts/4 occupied residential units)

Owner: Movil Development Corporation (Momir Guzijan)

Total Cost: $50,300

Funding Request: $15,000

 

Property Address: 167 Main Street, Beacon (I Storefronts/4 occupied residential units)

Owner: Movil Development Corporation (Momir Guzijan)

Total Cost: $33,500

Funding Request: $7,500

 

RESOLVED, that the Mayor is authorized to approve the applications submitted to Dutchess

County Department of Planning and Development from the above applicants for the Beacon Community Development Agency Facade Improvement Program 2005 Application Cycle.

 

Motion to add to this evening’s agenda – July 18, 2005 -:  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Motion to authorize Mayor to approve the application: Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Local Laws And Ordinances:

 

1.  Resolution No. 81 of 2005 - Proposed Local Law to Create Chapter 200 of the City of Beacon Code entitled “Taxicabs:  Set Public Hearing for Monday, August 1, 2005.  First Reading:  Table of Contents read by Gerard Pisanelli

 

Motion to dispense with reading of the contents of this law:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Motion to set Public Hearing:  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Ratifications:

 

Appointments/Announcements:

 

Final Opportunity for Public Comments:

 

Dennis Pavelock, Judson Street  - Mike brought up the riverfront and getting it developed.  I agree with that wholeheartedly but you will also invite more crime.  I would like to ask about the proposed outdoor handball court and where it stands.

 

Joan Van Voorhis - I agree with Fred regarding no police presence on Main Street, but I did, however, see a bike patrol officer.

 

The following letter was written by Betty DiPompo, 6 Pearse Place and distributed at the council meeting by Dennis Pavelock:

 

Subject:  Perception of inadequate charges for water and sewage services, for the previous four (4) billing cycles.

 

Honorable Mayor Clara Lou Gould

City Council Members

One Municipal Plaza

Beacon, New York 12508

 

Dear Mayor,

City Council Members

 

On Tuesday July 5, 2005, 1 called the Mayor Gould to express my concerns for the amount of my water and sewage charges. For the last four (4) billing cycles I have felt that the charges were inadequate. I have voiced my concerns to the accounting department and they have determined that the charges reflect the INFORMATION THEY HAVE ON HAND! Unfortunately this information reflects what is "downloaded" from the electronic repeater that is located on the exterior of my home. It is my contention that the electronic repeater is transmitting inaccurate information, and therefore my billing charges reflect the inaccuracy of the information. This is not an accounting department problem; this is a problem of faulty readings, being transmitted to the accounting department, by an inaccurate electronic repeater.

 

I asked the Mayor to have my water meter checked, as my water/sewage bill was only $55.38 dollars, for the last quarter. On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, prior to the scheduled Council meeting, I asked the Mayor, if the City was going to CHECK MY WATER METER! The Mayor told me that she had discussed my concerns with the City Administrator. The outcome of that discussion is that the City Administrator was of the opinion, that you if you conserve water, (based on the speculation of water conservation) then the $55.38 dollars is normal. I have inquired of my neighbors as to the amounts being billed on their water/sewage bill. All that I have inquired of have reported larger amounts than my quarterly bills. Allowing for the variables of family size, ages, building size, amount of bathrooms, and so forth, I am still perceive that I am being charged at a lower quarterly rate.

 

Please check my billing against the water/sewage charges reported to date. On Sunday 17 July 2005 at approximately 11:30 AM, the meter reading, from the meter inside my home, was as follows: 018,939.53. This is to present a base line for a recalculation of my water/sewage charges.

 

No further comments.

 

Budget Amendments: Requiring Council Action - July 18, 2005

 

       1.  Amend the General Fund Balance (Code: A 909) in the amount of $24,321.86 for Attorney expense (Code: A 1420.X4504.04 and A 1420.X4504.05) to cover fees owed to McCabe & Mack and Roemer, Wallens & Mineaux for the case of Buddenhagen vs. City of Beacon.

 

2.      Amend the Fire Department Budget (Code: A3410.X4619.00) in the amount of $4,500 to be transferred to Career Fire Lieutenant (Code: A3410.X1004.00) to pay Jeff Simko when he conducts fire prevention education classes.

 

Motion to Amend the General Fund Balance for Items 1 and 2 above:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Review of Bills:           Total Disbursements as of July 18, 2005                     $991,949.20

           

Next Workshop Date:            Monday, July 25, 2005 at 7:00 pm.Municipal Center

 

Next Council Meeting:            Monday, August 1, 2005 at 7:30 p.m.Municipal Center

 

Motion to enter Executive Session on a Personnel issue at 9:15 p.m.:  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Motion to end Executive Session at 9:30 p.m.:  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.   

 

Adjournment:  Motion to adjourn at 9:30 p.m.:  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.

 

Text from July 18, 2005 Reports

 

Mayor’s Correspondence:

 

07/06/05:  Carla Eylers, City Clerk

RE:  Liquor License for Mary Ryans Restaurant & Pub – 246 Main Street 

 

Having received notification from Chief of Police Sassi and Mayor Gould that they have no objection to the waiver requested in your letter of June 27, 2005, for the above mentioned liquor license application, I am happy to provide the following statement.

The City of Beacon, New York, 12508, has no objection to a Liquor License being granted to Mary-Ryans Restaurant & Pub, Inc. dba Mary-Ryans Restaurant & Pub at 246 Main Street, Beacon, New York 12508, and does hereby grant a waiver of the 30-day Notice required by the Alcohol Beverage Control Law.