Minutes

City of Beacon Council Meeting

June 20, 2005

 

REGULAR MEETING

 

The regular meeting of the Beacon City Council at Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza was called to order at   7:30 p.m. by Clara Lou Gould with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 

 

Council Members Present:                   Deanna Leake, Eleanor Thompson, Sam Way, Lee Kyriacou, Fred Antalek and Michael Fasano.

 

Also present were:                               City Administrator, Joseph Braun

                                                City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli

                                                David Stolman, AICP, PP President of Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc.  – Planning/Development

 

The media were represented by:                      Goldee Greene, Beacon Free Press

                                                             

Number of Residents at Beginning:     60

 

Public Hearings:

 

1.  Proposed Local Law A:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-10 One Family Residence District to R1-40 One Family Residence District. Adjourned March 21, 2005.  Will be adjourned on June 20, 2005 to a future date. Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun

2.  Proposed Local Law B:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-80 One Family Residence District. Adjourned March 21, 2005. Will be adjourned on June 20, 2005 to a future date.

3.  Proposed Local Law C:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-120 One Family Residence District. Adjourned March 21, 2005. Will be adjourned on June 20, 2005 to a future date.

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Council of the City of Beacon will hold

Public hearings on Monday, March 21, 2005 at the City of Beacon Municipal

Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m., or as soon

thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider three Proposed Local

Laws:

1.    Proposed Local Law A: Changing the Zoning of Property from R 1 -10 One Family

Residence District to Rl-40 One Family Residence District.

2.    Proposed Local Law B: Changing the Zoning of Property from R-l-40 One Family

Residence District to Rl-80 One Family Residence District.

        3.    Proposed Local Law C: Changing the Zoning of Property from R-l-40 One Family

Residence District to R 1-120 One Family Residence District.

 

These local laws are intended to implement an updating of the City's

Development Plan. The local laws will affect changes to the zoning of parcel No.

6054-02-596808 owned by Preshrock Corp., known as the Ursuline property.

The above local laws would take effect immediately upon filing with the

Secretary of State. Complete copies of the proposed local laws are available at

 

All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposal at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Comments for Hearing

 

Brendan J. Mayor, Attorney at Law – Shamberg Marwell, Davis & Hollis, P.C. representing the developer of the Hiddenbrooke Property - Just as a follow up of our meeting held in April, we thank you again for giving us this opportunity to speak.  Since then our surveyor has been out to inspect the site.  It is now in the hands of our engineers.

 

Sue Anfanti –We handed in a lot of names and spoke to a lot of people.  Most people in Beacon do not want Hiddenbrooke developed.  I hope the city is thinking about purchasing the land back.  If you can take some action to let them know how you feel.  We know how the people feel but they cannot do anything.  It is really in your hands. If there is anygthing you can do such as an option to buy or a moratorium – whatever you need to do to purchase the property back, I think it would be fair to everyone do something as quickly as possible.

 

Mike Lanari – I have to disagree with the previous speaker.  There are some parcels of property that were tax-exempt and we should try to get them back.  I think it is very bad to send a message that we are going to go around and buy up things.  I think it is beautiful and at one time I was thinking about purchasing property there.    If one would like to preserve the land, they should do so.

 

Bernadette Clement – 82 Judson Place - For every dollar a developer spends to build a house, it costs the city $1.25

 

Carol March 425 South Avenue, Beacon – I think developing something is irreversible.  By developing it, 20 years from now, you might say I made a mistake.  Other towns will look at Beacon as a special place.  We want to send a message that we are not greedy but we are thoughtful.  We consider each piece of property carefully.  I am very much for buying it and keeping it as a place to enjoy.

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson Street – There are a lot of great people that made Beacon what it is such as the man who donated the memorial park to Beacon.  I don’t know what this property can be but it can be made into a special place.

 

Shannon Murphy – As far as technology and use of chemicals to clean up this property, it does not replace the immediate interaction for us to have this place and share it and bring people here to learn so much about systems and silence.

 

Don Murphy:  I grew up on that property.  That is a very special place.  My fond memories of growing up are connected to that property.  I may be biased because of the time I spent with my grand parents.  If there is a way we can protect that land, it should be done.  There are very few pieces of property such as that.  From the things I am hearing here, Hiddenbrooke will become a huge draw for the tri state area to enjoy and worship at.

 

The following comments written by Peggy Rose, 456 Main Street dated June 20, 2005 were distributed to the City of Beacon Council Members on the June 20, 2005 Council Meeting.

 

FACTS OF HIDDENBROOKE

 

1. Owner wants to donate 80 acres back to the Carmelite Nuns to be left as open space, never to be sold and to protect their way of life.

 

2. Development will only take approximately 20 plus acres for town houses, which will bring more tax revenue into the community.

 

3. City had 15 yrs to buy this property if it had shown interest but is interested in paying $3.5 million of taxpayer money for a public park, which would require maintenance, roads and ground keeping at a greater cost to city tax payers.

 

4. It is our understanding that the City contacted the Dia Museum for a satellite museum/park to be put in the Hiddenbrooke property. This would be a terrible environmental impact to the wild life and the privacy of the religious order which still exists there, as well as impacting surrounding neighborhoods (foot traffic, parking, pollution, garbage from food, picnics, hiking, etc.)

 

5. Many properties have been converted to not for profit, which has put a tax burden on the citizens of Beacon and has not brought any new business to the community.

 

6. It is imperative to save our beautiful mountains therefore, we think the proposal in front of the counsel to donate 80 acres to the sisters of the Carmelites and some to the City is an equal balance to do both without costing any of the tax payers more money and protect the open space.

 

Dianna Burton – 84 Judson Place – Technology is all well and good.  There is a lot of technology on the planet and the planet is still polluted.   Where is the sensitivity?

 

Shannon Murphy – Hiddenbrooke – How do we integrate what is there already?  How do we share what is in this place with the rest of the community.  The chapel was given to a private citizen.  That is the heart of this monastery.  I feel that it not enough to give away the 30 acres and the chapel.  It is a whole integrated place and it needs to be shared.

 

Fritz Ohlhoff – Hiddenbrooke is a beautiful place.  I went there two weeks ago and I saw turkeys there.

 

Christopher Rhue – CSE –I want to mention that there is not only beautiful properties such as Hiddenbrooke.  There are many locations that need to be protected.

 

No further comments.

 

Motion to adjourn public hearing to unspecified date:  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

4.  Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 223, Zoning, and 195, Subdivision of Land, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to Private Roads, Driveways and Common Driveways.  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 20, 2005, at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider a Proposed Local Law Amending Chapters 223, Zoning, and 195, Subdivision of Land, of the City of Beacon Code with respect to Private Roads, Driveways and Common Driveways.

 

This local law is intended to incorporate private roads, common driveways and regulations therefore into Chapters 223 and 195 of the City Code.

 

The local law would take effect immediately upon its filing with the Secretary of State.  Complete copies of the proposed local law are available at the Municipal Center for inspection during regular business hours.

 

All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Comments:

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson Street – Who benefits from this Law?  What impact does it have on the Residents

 

David Stolman:  What this law does is amend the zoning law and sub-division regulations to allow the Planning board to provide standards for the construction of those private roads. – The roads will be kept private.  The city will not maintain these private roads.  The maximum number of homes is four, which can be extended to six. 

 

The following memorandum addressed to Mayor Gould and the City Council from Etha Grogan the Planning Board Secretary dated June 16, 2005 regarding Chapter 223 – Zoning and Chapter 195 – Subdivision of Land with respect to Private Roads and Common Driveways.  CC’s to City Administrator Braun and City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli.

 

At the June 14, 2005 Planning Board meeting, the Board reviewed proposed private road, driveway and common driveway legislation currently under consideration. After a lengthy review and discussion with City Planner David Stolman and City Engineer John Russo, members unanimously agreed that the intent and content of the law made good planning sense, and recommended the City Council proceed with enacting the proposed legislation.

 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

The following memo was addressed to City of Beacon Council from Dutchess County Department of Planning and Development dated June 17, 2005 and signed by John Clarke, Development and Design Coordinator:

 

To:  City Council, City of Beacon – Dated June 17, 2005

Re: Referral: 05-318, Local Law on Private Roads and Driveways

The Dutchess County Department of Planning & Development has reviewed the subject referral within the framework of General Municipal Law (Article12B, Sections 239-1 and 239-m). After considering the proposed action in the context of countywide and inter-municipal factors, the Department finds that the Board's decision involves a matter of some concern,

Action

The City is proposing changes to its Zoning and Subdivision Regulations in regards to private roads and common driveways.

Comments

We generally endorse the inclusion of private roads and common driveway standards. The section on cul-de-sacs, however, requires a diameter much too large. *Attached are design guidelines from various sources that recommend more compact turnarounds to limit impervious surfaces and increase green spaces. A statement could also be included that recommends interconnected or loop roads, whenever practical, rather than dead-end streets to improve access for service and emergency vehicles.

Recommendation

The Department recommends that the Board rely upon its own study of the facts in the case with due consideration of the above comments.

Roger P. Akeley, Commissioner

*Not attached to these minutes.  They are available at City of Beacon City Hall.

 

Motion to close Public Hearing:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

4.      Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 139 Section 9 Free Dumping at Recycling Center.  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 20, 2005, at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider a Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 131-9 Free Dumping at Recycling Center and Changing Name to Free Use of Recycling Center

 

This local law is intended to adjust the start time of free use of the Recycling Center in the City of Beacon and rename Section 131-9 as follows: “Free Use of Recycling Center”.

 

The local law would take effect immediately upon its filing with the Secretary of State.  Complete copies of the proposed local law are available at the Municipal Center for inspection during regular business hours.

 

All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Comments:

 

Betty DiPompo, 6 Pearse Place:  What do they want to do with the free dumping?

 

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli:  They only want to make the start date flexible.  There will be no other changes.

 

No further comments.

 

Motion to close Public Hearing:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

6.  Proposed Local Law Adding to Chapter 43 of the Beacon City Code Entitled Officers and Employees to Add Article III Hiring of Relatives.  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 20, 2005, at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter is reached on the agenda, to consider a Proposed Local Law to amend Chapter 43 of the Beacon City Code Entitled Officers and Employees by adding Article III Hiring of Relatives.

 

This local law is intended to amend Chapter 43 by adding Article III to provide guidelines for the City of Beacon to follow regarding the hiring of relatives.

 

The local law would take effect immediately upon its filing with the Secretary of State.  Complete copies of the proposed local law are available at the Municipal Center for inspection during regular business hours.

 

All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Comments:

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson Street - I want to thank Eleanor Thompson for staying on top of this. 

 

No further comments.

 

Motion to close Public Hearing:  Council Member Thompson.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Community Segment:            None

 

Approval of Minutes: The Mayor requested a motion to approve minutes for the following Beacon City Council Meeting: 

                                                June 6, 2005

 

Motion to approve minutes:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Text from the following reports for June 20, 2005 is at the end of these minutes:             

 

Mayors Communications – Read by Mayor Clara Lou Gould

City Administrator, Joseph Braun read his Report of Activities

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli gives his Report of Activities – 1st Meeting of the Month

Mayor Clara Lou Gould read her Report of Activities

Council Members gave their Reports of Activities

 

Public Comments:  Pertaining to This Agenda Only

 

None

 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

 

Local Laws and Ordinances:

 

1  Proposed Local Law A:   Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-10 One Family Residence District to R1-40 One Family Residence District. (Hiddenbrooke) Tabled - March 21, 2005.  Will be Tabled at June 20, 2005 Meeting - Second Reading:  read by

a.   Adopt Negative Declaration for Proposed Local Law A:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-10 One Family Residence District to R1-40 One Family Residence District.

b.      Adopt Proposed Local Law A:   Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-10 One Family Residence District to R1-40 One Family Residence District.

 

2.   Proposed Local Law B:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-80 One Family Residence District. (Hiddenbrooke) Tabled - March 21, 2005.  Will be Tabled at June 20, 2005 Meeting.  Second Reading:  read by

 

a.   Adopt Negative Declaration for Proposed Local Law B:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-80 One Family Residence District.

b.       Adopt Proposed Local Law B:   Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-80 One Family Residence District.

 

3.  Proposed Local Law C:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-120 One Family Residence District. (Hiddenbrooke) Tabled - March 21, 2005.  Will be Tabled at June 20, 2005 Meeting - Second Reading

a.      Adopt Negative Declaration for Proposed Local Law C:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-120 One Family Residence District.

b.      Adopt Proposed Local Law C:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-120 One Family Residence District.

 

Motion to table Proposed Local Law  A, B, and C - No. 1, 2, and 3 above to a future date:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Antalek.  All voted in favor except Council Member Kyriacou who voted “no”.  With a vote of six “yes” and one “no, motion carried.

 

4.   Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 223, Zoning, and 195, Subdivision of Land, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to Private Roads, Driveways and Common Driveways.  Second Reading.

 

a.      Resolution No. 62 of 2005 - Adopt Negative Declaration for Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 223, Zoning, and 195, Subdivision of Land, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to Private Roads, Driveways and Common Driveways.

 

ATTACHMENT

NEGATIVE DECLARATION:  REASONS SUPPORTING DETERMINATION

LOCAL LAW AMENDING THE CITY OF BEACON CODE

 CHAPTER 195, SUBDIVISION OF LAND AND CHAPTER 223, ZONING

 

The purpose of the proposed Local Law is to amend Chapter 195, Subdivision of Land, and Chapter 223, Zoning, of the City of Beacon Code to provide for the use of private roads, and to provide standards and regulations for private roads, driveways and common driveways. The Proposed Action does not directly involve any construction or development.

 

The use of private roads, as opposed to public City streets, will involve less grading, paving, storm water and overall site disturbance.  Therefore, the proposed Local Law will not have an adverse impact on the environment, but rather will improve the character of the community and better serve the City’s interest.

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

The Proposed Action will not result in any significant adverse impacts to the environment.  More specifically:

 

•           The Proposed Action will not directly result in any construction or physical changes to any properties.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on any Critical Environmental Area (CEA).

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on any unique or unusual landforms.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on any water body designated as protected.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on any non-protected existing or new body of water.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on surface or groundwater quality or quantity.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on or alter drainage flows or patterns, or surface water runoff.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on air quality.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on any threatened or endangered species.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on any non-threatened or non-endangered species.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on agricultural land resources.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on aesthetic resources.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on existing transportation systems. 

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on the community's sources of fuel or energy supply.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact as a result of objectionable odors, noise or vibration.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on the public health and safety.

 

•           The Proposed Action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact on the character of the existing community.

 

Based upon this information and the information in the Full Environmental Assessment Form, the City Council finds that the Proposed Action will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the environment.  This Negative Declaration indicates that no environmental impact statement need be prepared and that the SEQRA process is complete.

 

Motion to accept Negative Declaration for Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 223:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote in favor.  Motion carried.

 

b.      Resolution No. 63 of 2005 - Adopt Local Law No. 04 of 2005 -  Amending Chapter 223, Zoning, and 195, Subdivision of Land, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to Private Roads, Driveways and Common Driveways

 

PROPOSED LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 223, ZONING, AND 195, SUBDIVISION OF LAND, OF THE CITY OF BEACON CODE WITH RESPECT TO PRIVATE ROADS, DRIVEWAYS AND COMMON DRIVEWAYS

BE IT ENACTED by the City Council of the City of Beacon as follows:

SECTION 1.   TITLE

This local law shall be entitled, "A Local Law Updating Chapter 223 Zoning, and Chapter 195, Subdivision of Land, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to Private Roads, Driveways and Common Driveways."

SECTION 2.   INTENT AND PURPOSE

The intent and purpose of this Local Law is to incorporate private roads, common driveways and regulations therefor into Chapters 223 and 195 of the City Code.

SECTION 3.   CODE AMENDMENTS

1.           Section 223-12.G of the Beacon City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

G.Required street frontage. No building permit shall be issued for any structure unless the lot upon which that structure is to be built has the required frontage on a street, private road or highway, as defined herein, which street frontage, except in the case of a common driveway, provides the actual access to such structure, and which street, private road or highway shall have been suitably improved to the satisfaction of the Planning Board or a performance bond posted therefor as provided in § 36 of the General City Law (Chapter 21 of the Consolidated Laws) of New York State. 

2.              The following new definition shall be added to Section 223-63 of the Beacon City Code:

 PRIVATE ROAD – A road which is privately owned and maintained.

3.             Chapter 195, Subdivision of Land, is hereby amended and shall read as follows:

Chapter 195

SUBDIVISION OF LAND

ARTICLE I

General Provisions

§ 195-1.   Authority.

§ 195-2.   Jurisdiction.

§ 195-3.   Resubdivision.

§ 195-4.   Policy.

§ 195-5    Building permits.

§ 195-6.   Modification of regulations.

§ 195-7.   Changes to this chapter.

§ 195-8.   Separability clause.

§ 195-9.   Enactment.

ARTICLE II

Definitions

§ 195-10. Definitions.

ARTICLE III

Application Procedure

§ 195-11. General procedure.

§ 195-12. Initial conference and review.

§ 195-13. Preliminary plat.

§ 195-14. Final plat.

ARTICLE IV

Required Improvements and Agreements

§ 195-15. Completion of improvements or filing of bond.

§ 195-16. Inspection of improvements.

§ 195-17. Future status of Streets, parks and easements.

§ 195-18. Waiver of required improvements.

§ 195-19.                Certificates of occupancy for structures fronting on bonded streets and private roads.

ARTICLE V

General Requirements for Subdivision Design

§ 195-20. General.

§ 195-21. Streets.

§ 195-22. Private roads.

§ 195-2223.             Improvements.

§ 195-2324.             Lots and driveways.

§ 195-2425.             Reservations and easements.

§ 195-2526.             Miscellaneous.

ARTICLE VI

Specifications for Plats and Plans

§ 195-2627.             Preliminary plat.

§ 195-2728.             Preliminary construction plans.

§ 195-2829.             Final subdivision plat.

§ 195-2930.             Final construction plans.

ARTICLE I

General Provisions

§ 195-1.  Authority.

By authority of the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the General City Law, the Planning Board has the power and authority to review and approve or disapprove plats
showing lots, blocks or sites, with or without streets, private roads or highways, within the City of Beacon. 

§ 195-2.  Jurisdiction.

Land within the City of Beacon may be subdivided into lots, blocks or sites, with or without streets, private roads or highways, only if approved by the Planning Board in accordance with the procedures and requirements as set forth in this chapter and only if the approved plat is duly filed in the Office of the County Clerk of Dutchess County, New York.  Construction, excavation, filling, regrading, clearing of vegetation, or other similar activities related to a proposed subdivision shall not be begun within any area proposed or intended for subdivision until said subdivision shall have been approved, or approved with modifications by the Planning Board.

§ 195-3.  Resubdivision.

A resubdivision, as defined herein, is subject to the same procedure, rules and regulations applicable to an original subdivision.

§ 195-4.  Policy.

It is declared to be the policy of the City to consider land subdivisions as part of a plan for the orderly, efficient and economical development of the City.  Land to be subdivided shall be of such character that it can be used safely for building or development purposes without danger to health or peril from fire, flood or other menace, and without resulting in significant damage to the ecology of the area in which it is located.  Proper provision shall be made for drainage, water, sewerage, electric, telephone, gas, and other needed improvements.  The proposed streets, private roads or highways shall compose a convenient system conforming to the Official Map and shall be properly related to the proposals shown on the City Development Plan.  Streets, private roads or highways shall be of such width, grade and location as to accommodate the prospective traffic, to afford adequate light and air, and to facilitate fire and police protection.  In proper cases, and when required by the Planning Board, a park or parks of suitable location, size, and character for playground or other recreational purposes shal