Minutes

City of Beacon Council Meeting Minutes

April 4, 2005

 

REGULAR MEETING

 

The regular meeting of the Beacon City Council held at the Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza on April 4, 2005 was called to order at 7:37 p.m. by Mayor Clara Lou Gould with the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag immediately following the Traffic and Safety Committee Meeting

 

Council Members Present:                   Deanna Leake, Sam Way, Lee Kyriacou, Fred Antalek and Michael Fasano.

 

Council Members Excused:                 Eleanor Thompson

 

Also present were:                               City Administrator, Joseph Braun

                                                            City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli

 

The media was represented by:            Goldee Greene, Beacon Free Press

                                                            Michelle Lee, Poughkeepsie Journal

 

Residents at beginning of meeting:      80 (filled to capacity)             

 

Public Hearings: - Adjourned from March 21, 2005 – (To Be Adjourned Until June 20, 2005)

 

1.                Proposed Local Law A: Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-10 One Family Residence District to R1-40 One Family Residence District.

2.                Proposed Local Law B:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-80 One Family Residence District.

3.                Proposed Local Law C:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-120 One Family Residence District.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould’s Comments: This hearing is being adjourned until June 20, 2005.  Tonight is an opportunity for those who have not had a chance to speak to do so.  In addition we invite those who wish to write a letter to the City Planning Board to do so between now and June 20, 2005.

 

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli’s Comments:  It should be noted that these represent three separate laws pertaining to three different areas.

 

Public Comments for this Hearing:

 

Tom Baldino, 19 North Street – Read the following letter from Steve Gold, 46 Pleasant View Drive who was not able to be here tonight: 

 

To: Beacon City Council, From Steve Gold, regarding Hiddenbrooke dated April 4, 2005.

 

I am working this evening so please accept these comments in the record and be distributed to the Council for their consideration.

 

I would first like to express that the property at Hiddenbrooke is unique and any steps that can be taken to preserve it for the enjoyment of Beacon residents should be fully explored. It would be best used for recreation so residents can walk its grounds and enjoy its magnificent beauty.

 

The first consideration should be to include it into the city's future master plan. To permit multi‑unit houses on the scale that is being presented would cause a clear impact on the cities roads, services and schools. To proceed without looking at the larger scale of the City as a whole may present future unforeseen consequences that would be detrimental to everyone's quality of life. Therefore I support a building moratorium as outlined by Councilman Lee Kyricou.

 

Second, with the large volumes of run off that would be created by development on this property because of the high elevation in parts, it would appears necessary to require a full environmental impact statement and not accept a negative declaration.

 

Third, if the City has not yet adopted a local law that would require certain developments to be clustered based on terrain and the preservation of esthetic or historically significantly property, it should adopt such a law immediately and before approving any other zoning in the city. This law should then be applied to require a clustered development on the level parts of the property leaving the elevated two thirds free from development.

 

Fourth, County Executive Steinhaus has previously stated to former Councilman Steve Gold that funds are available for purchase of properties in the City of Beacon for the purpose of land preservation. Although that statement was made several years back and previously communicated by myself to the Council, it is still worth the effort to rekindle this opportunity. Mr. Steinhaus has demonstrated many times in Dutchess County that he is a proponent of land preservation and may still be of assistance for the City or County to purchase parts or the entire property.

 

The following letter from Lou Sebesta, 47 Russell Avenue containing his comments was distributed to the members of the Beacon City Council dated April 5, 2005:

 

To the members of the Beacon City Council:

RE: Public Hearing on Consideration of Building Moratorium for Hiddenbrooke Site

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I appeal to you to seriously consider enacting a moratorium on implementation of development plans for the Hiddenbrooke site and all other significantly large parcels of land in the city until a collaborative review and updating of our long obsolete Comprehensive Plan can be undertaken.

 

Such a moratorium is of the most critical essence at this time, because land use planning for large parcels has such long term and significant impacts on the future environmental, economic, and cultural well being of our community. Our old plan is impossibly outdated and inapplicable to the drastically changed character and needs of our current and future community. Therefore, we should not proceed at this time along the guidelines of our old plan, particularly in regard to large open space parcels.

 

Rather, we need to undertake a collaborative process to review our existing environmental resources and update our vision for Beacon's future in a revised Comprehensive Plan in light of new information and state of the art thinking on green and sustainable development. Only after that process is complete should such large scale and far reaching land use decisions be entertained.

 

Thank you for your consideration.  Sincerely,

 

The following is a letter addressed Mayor Clara Lou Gould dated March 3, 2005 from Bill and Jud Keating, 232 South Smith Road, Lagrangville, NY -

 

Thank you for all you have done to help make Beacon the remarkably finer city it is today.

 

My wife and I bought our first house in Beacon in 1972 and still own it today, though we live in Union Vale.

 

In 1972 Beacon was run down and had problems. We chose to live there because we wanted our children to be raised in what we considered a hard working community which just happened to be down on its luck. Our hope was that change would occur for the better and we would be there for it. It did, ever so slowly.

 

We also chose Beacon because my wife was raised there and especially because of the amazing natural beauty which existed in and about the city.

 

Our sons attended Beacon schools through the fourth and eight grades respectively. To this day they will say that their best friends were made there, though they are now twenty‑eight and thirty‑one years old. To this day, my wife and I will say that our finest neighbors and friends are still the same people who live next to or across from 86 Depuyster. Ave.

 

I tell you all this to lend credence to our feelings about the division and development of the Hiddenboooke property. We are not just owners of a piece of property shooting our mouth off. We loved Beacon then; we love it now. And, we may well move back to this house, our first home.

 

But, Hiddenbrooke! For our thirteen years on DePuyster Ave, I ran almost every day. There are extremely few places in and around Beacon that I did not run to. My all time favorite ran was through Hiddenbrooke before the sun was up onto the trail above it and then up Mt. Beacon. Looking down at a city still asleep and the grandeur of the Hudson Valley is to this day but a silent meditation away.

 

Our favorite family story features my oldest son, then five years old and quite small of stature. Even at that age he was an avid fisherman and devotee of the pond at Jessen Park.

 

He somehow also discovered the pond in front of the novitiate in Hidddenbrooke unbeknownst to us.

 

I had bought him a small version of a hunting jacket with oversized pockets. Years later we learned that on more than one occasion he would catch a fish in Hiddenbrooke and then stick it into one of those big pockets and run as fast as his little legs would carry him to the pond at Jessen Park, to stock that pond with his stolen catch. Despite these early crimes he is an honorable citizen today.

 

But, I digress. Hiddenbrooke was and is now a sanctuary. I trespassed as a runner in the wee hours only because of the return in time its beauty and silence offered. Somehow those several hundred steps from Depuyster transported me to the mountains of my grandparent's Austria, or the Adirondack peaks of my own lifetime. If you have not experienced Hiddenbrooke, steal (with permission, of course) into its sacred presence real early some morning and just let its magic speak to you. To make a decision about this Beacon treasure without doing so would surely be a sin.

 

Beacon has many natural gifts. Scarsdale does not have them. Bedford does not have them. They certainly do not have anything like Hiddenbrooke, and they never will. Nor Will Beacon, However, if You Decide to Permit this Sacred Spot to be Developed Now.

 

Hopefully some conservation group or philanthropist will enter our dilemma and purchase it from the present developer so that it may become the designated "forever wild" area it should have become a long time ago.

 

Please do not permit this sacred spot to be developed!

 

If a moratorium on development is needed‑ and it is‑ for the creation of a new master plan for Beacon, Please do it!!! Time we have. Another Hiddenbrooke we do not have.

 

I thank you for taking the time to read our feelings.

 

Please feel free to share this with anyone and everyone involved in this important decision.

 

And, please, if you have not visited Hiddenbrooke early, early in the morning, do so. And, equally as important, the top of Mt Beacon ‑ in case some developer comes to consider this fair game.

 

Dennis Pavelock, Judson Street - They are saving some land in Rochester and they are saving land in Fishkill.  I would like to see them save some land in Beacon. 

 

Dick Murphy –I’m here to support the moratorium.  I am a long time resident of the western end of town.  I see the value of the beautiful land up there and the need to preserve as much of it as possible.  I urge a moratorium on development so we can look into its possibility.

 

Marcia Frahman, 19 North Street – Nine years ago I moved to Beacon.  A lot has happened since that time.  I would like to see Hiddenbrooke saved.  Hiddenbrooke can be a beautiful place and I hope you will keep it that way.

 

Tony Beck, 51 Violet Drive – I live right on the fringe of that land.  On Friday and Saturday, we had a lot of rain.  The main creek that feeds into the pond at Jessen Park was almost overflowing onto the road.  I appreciate the city workers being there to be sure no debris got caught.  If there had been snowmelt, we would have had a disaster.  The other problem is that the Jessen Park area has raised ranches that are vulnerable to floods.  I definitely support a moratorium

 

Florence Yukon– I have lived here 18 months.  I cherish the beauty of this lovely city.  Remember that people will come here the same way they come for DIA.  We must save our precious beauty.  We must prevent mudslides and flooded homes.  I support a moratorium

 

Fritz Orhloff – Last week I took a walk through Hiddenbrooke by the pond.  We must save as much land as we can.  The creek was never cleaned.  There are trees growing right in the middle of the creek and it creates a dam.  The developer is planning on putting four houses on one acre. That is too many.

 

Michelle Lee, Reporter for the Poughkeepsie Journal – Why was the hearing postponed to June? 

 

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli:  We are still working on SEQR, the environmental studies.

 

John Berry – I lived in Beacon for 32 years.  Just this past week, I drove to Depuyster Road twice.  Both times in the area of Jessen Park, I drove through three or four inches of water crossing the road.  This means that an awful lot of water was coming down.  I have been concerned about the water coming down the mountain for a lot of years since I live on the mountain.   Proper development of that land requires good drainage.  The thing that I am confused about is the article in the Poughkeepsie Journal.  The developer bought 123 Acres.  He was going to so-call donate 90 acres back to the city or to somebody else.  That only leaves 33 acres.  So if you put in zoning of one-acre lots that allows for 33 houses.  He proposed 65.houses.  So, I am a bit confused.  I am going to keep an eye on this.  I also don’t like the idea of all these constant postponements.  I will not let this slide through the crack.  I will watch it.

 

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli:  There is going to be a preliminary presentation of this project at the Planning Board next Tuesday.  This will give the public an idea of what they are planning to do.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould:  And as our City Engineer has said, they do not know what they are going to do until the entire engineering process has been done.  This includes the drainage situation and what can and cannot be done on that property.

 

Betty DiPompo, 6 Pierce Drive – The residents that came out this evening concerning this situation all told you how they feel about this.  I hope the city government pays attention and does what they want.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould reiterated that if anyone can think of anything more they would like to say about this project to please write a letter to the Planning Board before June 20, 2005.

 

No further comments

 

Motion to adjourn hearing until June 20, 2005.  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried. 

 

Community Segment:            Dennis Pavelock, representative of Concerned Citizens Coalition introduced Rick Price who gave a verbal presentation of his artistic work producing beautiful Murals, which he would be pleased to do for Beacon.  He is currently maintaining his freelance career in Beacon, NY, and serving the Hudson Valley’s Chthonic Clash Coffeehouse.  His mural work and other work can be seen on his website rick@rickprice.net or via phone at 845-440-0252.

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould asked for a motion to approve Council Meeting Minutes for:

                                   

                                    March 21, 2005

 

Motion to accept minutes:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Reports:  Text from the following reports is at the end of these minutes for April 4, 2005

 

Mayor’s Communications read by Mayor Clara Lou Gould

City Administrator, Joseph Braun read his Report of Activities

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli read his Report of Activities – 1st Meeting of the Month

Mayor Clara Lou Gould read her Report of Activities

Council Members each gave their Reports of Activities

 

Public Comments:  Pertaining to This Agenda Only - None

 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

 

Local Laws and Ordinances: - To Remain Tabled

 

1.                Second Reading:  Proposed Local Law A:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-10 One Family Residence District to R1-40 One Family Residence District. Tabled - March 21, 2005

 

2.                Second Reading:  Proposed Local Law B:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-80 One Family Residence District. Tabled - March 21, 2005

 

3.                Second Reading:  Proposed Local Law C:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-120 One Family Residence District. Tabled - March 21, 2005

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

 

1.  Resolution No. 33 of 2005 - Dutchess County Mutual Aid Plan – Resolution Authorizing the Participation of the City of Beacon Fire Department in the Dutchess County Mutual Aid Plan.  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

RESOLVED, that the City Council having jurisdiction over the City of Beacon Fire Department authorizes the participation of the Beacon Fire Department in the Dutchess County Mutual Aide Plan, and certifies to the Dutchess County Legislature through the Dutchess County Emergency Response Coordinator that no restrictions exist against “outside services” by such Fire Department named herein within the meaning of Section 209 of the General Municipal Law, which would effect the power of said Fire Department to participate in such plan and be it further;

 

RESOLVED, that this resolution supersedes all previous like resolutions, and be it further;

 

RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be filed with the Dutchess County Office of Emergency Response.

 

Motion to authorize the participation of the City of Beacon Fire Department:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

2.  Resolution No. 34 of 2005 - Ratify Traffic Safety Committee Recommendations:  Ratification of Traffic Safety Committee Determination to place stop signs at various intersections in the City of Beacon and to regulate stopping on Robert Cahill Drive

 

WHEREAS, the Traffic Safety Committee has held a public hearing to receive public input for a series of proposals to install stop signs at various intersections of the City of Beacon and to regulate stopping on Robert Cahill Drive in the City of Beacon on April 4, 2005, now, therefore, be it

 

RESOLVED, that the determination of the Traffic Safety Committee to require the following actions be hereby ratified:

 

1.      Install ‘Stop Sign’ on Church Street traveling both ways at the intersection of North Elm Street.

 

2.      Install ‘Stop Sign’ on Church Street traveling both ways at the intersection of North Brett Street.

 

3.      Install ‘No Stopping’ sign while school is in session during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Robert Cahill Drive

 

4.      No parking here to corner 30 feet back both sides on South Cedar at Main. – (Added at Meeting)

 

5.      No parking here to corner 30 feet back northeast corner of DeWindt at South Cedar. (Added at Meeting)

 

Motion to amend resolution to add No. 4 and 5 regarding 30 feet from corner:  Council member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Motion to ratify Traffic and Safety recommendations:  Council Member Kyriacou.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano. All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Local Laws And Ordinances:

 

1.  Resolution No. 35 of 2005 - Proposed Local Amending Chapter 223, Zoning, of the City of Beacon Code with Respect to New Uses, and Parking Standards and Regulations therefore.  Set Public Hearing for Monday, April 18, 2005.  First Reading:  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

Motion to set public hearing for April 18, 2005:  Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Ratifications:

 

Appointments/Announcements:

 

Appointments to Committee to Review  Comprehensive Plan Review:

Planning Board

Zoning Board

Conservation Advisory Committee

BACA – Sara Pasti

Historical Society – Joan VanVoorhis

Residents:

Todd Spire

John Stella

Patricia Dunne

Thomas Skipwith

Javier Guillen

Gary Wood

Thomas Baldino

Catherine C. Allgauer

Randall Martin

Youth Representative – Paul Salvas recommends:

Brian Debronsky

Joseph Fiege

 

Council Member Kyriacou:  I was not at the workshop. This looks like a wonderful list.  My only comments would be that the youth representatives should not be both male.  You might want to add the School Board and County Planning.

 

Final Opportunity for Public Comments:

 

Tom Baldino, 19 North Street – Read updates on nuclear power.  He also gave the council the following articles and asked that they be placed on the record.

 

March 30, 2005

Agencies Fight Over Report on Sensitive Atomic Wastes

By MATTHEW L. WALD

 

WASHNGTON, March 29 ‑ A semisecret debate is raging between the National Academy of Sciences and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission about the vulnerability of nuclear wastes to terrorist attack and about how secret the debate should be.

 

The academy, under orders from Congress, produced a study last summer about whether the spent‑fuel pools at nuclear reactors were vulnerable to terrorist attacks. The pools hold most of the radioactive material ever produced at the reactors, far more than the reactors themselves. After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, an independent group of scientists published a paper in a Princeton scientific journal asserting that an enemy could drain a pool and set a fire that would be "significantly worse than Chernobyl."

 

Academy officials say they have hit a roadblock in releasing their report. By law, the academy, which Congress charters, coordinates the work of academic experts from around the country, and it is supposed to make its findings public. In cases like the nuclear waste one, it is supposed to work with the relevant federal agency to develop a version of its report that has no information that would be useful to terrorists.

 

The academy sent a draft to the regulatory commission in November. But the two have not agreed on what information to release. A commission official said the problem was if aggregation." Although no secret facts appear in the academy version, piecing together the material disclosed would provide useful information.

 

This month, the academy took the unusual step of sending its version to members of Congress, with classified information removed but still including "safety sensitive information."

 

A few days later, the commission sent several lawmakers, Democrats and Republicans, a rebuttal to the classified report. A spokesman, Eliot Bremer, said this was not a response to the academy, but because Congress wanted to know what actions the commission would take.

 

According to the commission, the academy panel had "identified some scenarios that are unreasonable."

 

The rebuttal, sent by Nils J. Diaz, chairman of the commission, said using those situations could "lead to a misinterpretation of the actual risk, and this can cause confusion."

 

Some ideas put forward by the academy "lacked a sound technical basis," including having reactor operators move more fuel from the pools to dry casks, said the rebuttal,

which was sent to Senator Pete V. Domenichi the New Mexico Republican who is chairman of a Senate subcommittee on energy and water.

 

Among engineers, those are fighting words. The rebuttal's characterization is "an incomplete and, consequently, less than accurate description of what our classified report had to say," the executive officer of the academy, E. William Colglazier, said in a telephone interview.

 

In separate interviews, two of the scientists who provided peer review of the academy study and an author of the study agreed. All three said they could not talk about what the report said because it remained classified at the insistence of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

 

When nuclear fuel is taken out of the reactor, it has to stay in the pool because it generates so much heat. After about five years, it cools enough to be put in a sealed cask of steel and concrete.

 

The casks are filled with inert gas to prevent rust. The fuel warms the gas, which transfers its heat to the exterior of the cask. Nearly half the reactors in the United States use such casks because they have run out of space in their fuel pools and because the government has not accepted the waste for permanent disposal. Building the casks is expensive, and the power plant operators have constructed them only as needed and not fast enough to lower the inventories in the pools.

 

The commission has repeatedly said cask storage and pool storage are equally safe. On March 14, Dr. Diaz told reporters at the National Press Club, "I don't see them as a significant radiological risk."

 

At many plants, the pools are belowground or nearly so, making attacks difficult. But at some reactors, the plants are well above grade. In Mr. Diaz's rebuttal, he refers to a recommendation by the academy that plants be analyzed individually to evaluate their vulnerability and that at some the commission "might determine that earlier movements of spent fuel from pools to dry storage would be prudent."

 

Frank N. Von Hippel, a Princeton professor and co‑author of the study that brought the issue to prominence, was also brought in as a peer reviewer of the academy study. He said it did not go nearly far enough in urging dry storage.

 

"I found it peculiar that the N.R.C. said they did," Dr. von Hippel said.

 

A declassified version might explain the apparent discrepancy. Mr. Bremer, the commission spokesman, said his agency sent a new draft to the academy on Tuesday.

 

Yucca Safety – Tom Baldino

 

THIS WEEK

Federal Scientists Falsified Yucca Safety Evaluations

March 29, 2005

Reporting by Roddy Scheer

 

In what could be a crushing blow to Bush administration plans to store the nation's nuclear waste at Nevada's Yucca Mountain, the Energy Department has announced that federal scientists may have misrepresented findings regarding the potential for water to seep into and jeopardize storage facilities at the controversial site.

 

Without revealing any more specifics, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman reported last week that ff certain employees of the U.S. Geological Survey ... may have falsified documentation of their work" on Yucca Mountain from 1998 to 2000.

 

Ever since Yucca Mountain was proposed as the nation's central repository for nuclear waste, federal scientists have maintained that little or no water could penetrate 800 feet into the site where more than 150 million pounds of radioactive nuclear waste is slated for storage.

 

Meanwhile, opponents of developing Yucca Mountain for nuclear waste storage ‑ including environmentalists and most Nevada residents‑‑contend that water could seep into the mountain, corrode the metal waste storage canisters, and contaminate the water supply on which nearby communities, such as Las Vegas 90 miles away, depend.

 

The Bush administration has been pushing for the creation of new nuclear power plants as a key aspect of its beleaguered energy plan. But new facilities can only be created if the government has a satisfactory method of storing the radioactive waste generated. Indeed, if Yucca Mountain is taken off the table after two decades of study and debate, it could sound the death knell for the expansion of nuclear power in the U.S.

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson Street – I would like to offer congratulations to two officers, Don Van Buren and John Crone, for their participation in the self-defense class for the girl scouts.  I would like to see it extended citywide.  I would like to see the proposed tennis program come to Green Street.  It was proposed for Memorial and South Avenue and when I asked about Green Street, I would like to know why I was told “no”. Who made that decision without going in front of the council?  I would like the Tioronda Bridge saved.  I would like background checks done for volunteers and ask that this be put on the workshop agenda for discussion.  As I have said, there are unwanted people in Beacon and we have to keep an eye on our children.  A weeklong disaster drill is planned in New Jersey at a cost of sixteen million dollars.  Our first responders know what to do but what about the rest of the residents?  I have not had a response from the city regarding this issue.  I will keep a focus on that. The people on Grove Street would like to have their concern addressed regarding the sloppy black top job that was done there.

 

Marcia Frahman, 19 North Street - I would like to thank Council Member Antalek regarding what the houses look like with all the garbage and trash in their yards I live next door to a man who lives at 17 North Street who has garbage and junk in his yard.  He has been cited and gone to court but the trash still has not been cleaned up.  If anybody has any ideas, I would appreciate hearing them.

 

Craig Wolf, Liberty Street - I want to thank those who support the moratorium.  This issue of the mountain in general needs a good hard look.  I don’t think that it has ever been taken to the degree that it needs to be.  I am glad to see that you are moving in that direction.  I encourage you to take the time you need to do the job right.  I have a concern about the flood issue with all the rain we have had in the past week.  The last meeting I heard something about the flood zone being re-evaluated.  I would appreciate hearing more about that process, who the coordinator is and who is connected to that process.

 

John Berry – In answer to Council Member Antalek - the Boy Scout Troup that I am connected with will be cleaning the Madam Brett Homestead of debris within the next two weeks.  We do that every April when the snow melts.  It is six acres and we usually get a ton or so of debris off of that property every year.  Maybe some of the residents will follow suit.

 

No further comments

 

Budget Amendments: Council Action Budget Amendments – April 4, 2005

 

1.         Amend the General Fund Budget Insurance Recovery Revenue (A 1325.R2680.00)

             in the amount of $3,905.00 to be transferred to Fire Department Repair of Equipment

            (A 3410.X4472.00).  This amount represents the amount received on March 29, 2005 from Zurich Insurance Company for the damage to a 1986 Pierce Fire Truck on

            January 24, 2005.

 

Motion to Amend the General Budget Insurance Recovery Revenue:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

2.         Amend the General Fund Balance (Code:  A909) for the Fire Department in the amount

            of $48,000.00.  These funds are to be transferred to the following:

 

                                    A 3410.X2500.           $48,000            Purchase of Bunker Gear

 

                                    Additional funds are needed to cover the cost of equipment for new

                                    volunteers and to replace old, worn equipment of current volunteers.