Minutes

City of Beacon Council Meeting

March 7, 2005

 

REGULAR MEETING

 

The regular meeting of the Beacon City Council at the Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza was called to order at 7:51 p.m. (immediately following Workshop) by Mayor Clara Lou Gould with the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.

 

Council Members Present:                   Deanna Leake, Eleanor Thompson, Samuel Way, Lee Kyriacou, Fred Antalek and Mike Fasano.

 

Also Present:                                        City Administrator, Joseph Braun

                                                            City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli

David Stolman, AICP, PP President of Frederick P. Clark Assciates, Inc. Planning/Development/ Environment/ Transportation

Art Tully, of Lanc & Tully Engineering and Surveying, P.C. City Engineer

                                                            Tim Dexter, Building and Safety Inspector

 

The media were represented by:          Goldee Greene, Beacon Free Press

                                                            Michelle Lee, Poughkeepsie Journal

 

Residents presents at beginning:          35                   

 

Public Hearings:

 

1. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Stormwater Permit Requirements

 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Beacon will hold a public hearing on Monday, March 7, 2005, at the City of Beacon Municipal Center, One Municipal Plaza, Beacon, New York at 7:30 P.M., Or As Soon Thereafter As The Matter Is Reached On The Agenda, in which a brief overview of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Storm water Permit Requirements and current status of the project will be given.

 

City of Beacon, through the consorted effort of the Building Department and Highway Department should have been implementing requirements of this permit over the last several years.  Previous work has involved the review of the existing code to see what revisions should be made to bring the City code requirements into compliance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regulations. In addition, Highway Department personnel, in conjunction with Dutchess County Soil Conservation Service, have begun to conduct mapping of outfall areas of all municipal-owned storm water management facilities.

 

The Planning Board over the last year has taken a detailed look at all proposed projects, including those under construction, to ensure that erosion and sediment control requirements are being met during the planning process. This work is proposed to continue over the next year to include expanding the Outreach Program that keeps the public abreast of these changes. This is accomplished by the use of pamphlets, leaflets and messages on cable access television/blue screen.

 

All interested persons and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard on said proposals at the date, time and place aforesaid.

 

Public Hearing Comments:

 

Art Tully, City Engineer:  The City of Beacon was designated by NYS DOT as a small MS4 community.  The MS4 stands for Municipal Separate Storm water System that is basically a program to clean up storm water runoff in communities throughout the state and the country.  We have developed a program that the city has implemented and continues to implement which is a five-year program.  We are required to hold a public hearing annually on that program which is being held at the March 7, 2005 Council meeting that is tonight.  This will give the public an opportunity to comment and provide input to the program and to make any amendments and changes that we see fit as we move forward in our next year’s agenda.

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson St.  -  I attended the original meeting at the Holiday Inn in April of 2002 in regards to this storm water management and there were people from different communities.  There are three different penalties if the community does not follow the plan that will result in pretty stiff fines.  I would like you to go over that if you can.

 

Art Tully said that he does not have this information with him but he will get back to Dennis Pavelock.

 

Council Member Kyriacou:  Your letter from Lanc and Tully says that the governing body needs to hold a Public Hearing during one of the meetings.  Obviously, the purpose of that is for the public to understand what the project is.  Have we provided the public enough information for them to comment on this?  The impression I am getting from those sitting out there is that this is something that nobody understands.

 

Art Tully, City Engineer:  No, we have not.  The reason is that this is the first year that we are implementing the program.  As part of the subsequent years, we are going to be developing literature and information will be put on cable television so it is more of an outreach program as we become familiar with it.  The first year was spent in developing the program, identifying pipes, trying to understand what is going on in the city in terms of where our problem areas are for storm water quality. As time goes on, we will be involved more and more in the program.

 

Council Member Kyriacou:  If we truly want public comments, we need to put something out there that will provide a brief overview of the current status of the program. I am willing to continue this hearing until we get something out there.  I just don’t want to have someone complain later on that we had a hearing but there was no information.

 

Art Tully:  There was information.  We did an Annual Report in October where we described the work that was done the previous year and what we anticipated happening in subsequent years.  This information has been available since October in City Hall to review.

 

Council Member Thompson:  I agree with Lee.  Something should be put in the newspaper so that the residents of Beacon will be able to understand the project.

 

Art Tully:  That’s fine.  Our intention is to make the community aware that storm water quality is an important issue for all of us and if keeping the public hearing open is a measure to do this than we are all for it.

 

Motion to adjourn Public Hearing until the public can be informed and understand more about this project. Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Community Segment:  None

 

Mayor Clara Lou Gould asked for approval of Minutes for Council Meeting -     

 

February 22, 2005

 

Motion to approve Minutes:  Council Member:  Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Reports:  Text from these reports for March 7, 2005 is at the end of these minutes.             

 

Mayor’s Communications read by Mayor Clara Lou Gould

City Administrator, Joseph Braun gave a report of his Activities

City Attorney, Gerard Pisanelli read his Report of Activities – 1st Meeting of the Month

Mayor Clara Lou Gould read her Report of Activities

Council Members gave their Reports of Activities

 

Public Comments:  Pertaining to This Agenda Only

 

A copy of the following letter from Lou Sebesta, 47 Russell Avenue, Beacon NY dated March 7, 2005 was distributed to the council addressed to Mayor Clara Lou Gould, Administrator, Joe Braun and Members of the Beacon City Council:

 

RE: Comments on Subdivision Proposal for Hiddenbrooke Property, Beacon, NY

 

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I appeal to you to take a much closer look at these proposals from an environmental and community public resource perspective. It is critical that the City of Beacon conserve this rarest of resources for the public‑ the single remaining significant parcel of open, largely natural land remaining in the City of Beacon.

 

This land is a natural and cultural treasure, containing scenic forests and streams with high potential as a low impact public recreation area, wildlife habitat, and is a prime gateway to the open spaces of the Hudson Highlands conservation area lands owned by Scenic Hudson; for these main reasons it should be conserved for public benefit and not developed at all, or at least not to the scale of the existing proposals.

 

Merely relying on the presence of various developments and open spaces existing at the Beacon waterfront, most of which are not owned by the City of Beacon, will not reserve enough of this precious resource of public natural open space for our citizens now and in the future. Natural open space will become recognized as an increasingly cherished resource for maintenance of a high quality of life for our citizens as more and more open land for habitat and low impact recreation is gobbled up by encroaching sprawl development in the immediately surrounding environment in the town of Fishkill. What we have reserved for our public heritage will be seen as inadequate to serve our expanding population now and in the future.

 

Simply expanding the zoning to allow larger parcels in not the answer, since most developers cut down all the trees and create vast acreage of high income enclaves of mega‑mansions surrounded by unnatural turf grass, unavailable to the public.

 

Ideally, the city should make the developer an offer to recoup his investment and conserve this parcel for the citizens of Beacon for today and for the future. A consensus process could be pursued to plan a variety of uses, but most of which should be conserved in open space due to its ecological sensitivity and value as a natural asset.

 

If this ideal alternative is not possible or the will of the city is not to take this course, then at a minimum the city of Beacon should negotiate with the developer to pursue plans in the character of "cluster development", in which a smaller proportion of land closer to Depuyster Avenue is consigned to housing, while the majority of the land, particularly the acreage further up hill, and which contains sensitive wetlands and more pristine forest suitable for trails and low impact recreation and wildlife habitat should be maintained for the public in a permanent conservation easement.

 

Thank you for considering my perspective on this important issue. I appeal to you to make the right decision for the citizens of Beacon.

 

Matt Kinney:  I live and work in Beacon.  I think what the city is planning for the Hiddenbrook property will destroy the resource for this town spiritually and environmentally.

 

Avery Long – 59 Beacon Street –Regarding Hiddenbrook Property. I cannot believe that no one is fired up about this.  There are some trees that are very old.  Looking around there is not much land left.  I think something needs to be done.  I cannot believe that everyone is so blind as to what is being done.  I do not know what the plan is exactly but Hiddenbrook is a wonderful resource.   We need to have children there.  There are so many passionate artists that want to do something with this property.   We need a little bit of support.  We need to save this property.  There is so much potential.  I want people to sit up and take a breath of this precious fresh air.

 

Bernadette Clement, 82 Jessen Place – The first thing I would like to say over and over and over again, “Hiddenbrook means hidden springs”.  When this builder goes in and tries to develop, he is going to run into springs.  There are a couple of houses in our community that were built on springs during a drought.  Now when it rains their house floods.  The second thing that the Mayor brought up is that Mount Beacon is on a seal.  It is beautiful, beautiful land and that is why it was picked.  The DEC must get involved.  Is it possible that the DEC can come to the next March 21st meeting?  Also, it not just for the East End, it is for the entire City of Beacon.  I hope this council sits down to vote for this property and listen to what we are saying.  Thank you.

 

Tom Baldino, 19 North Street.  Regarding Hiddenbrook.  Statistics show that when you develop open land, it costs more in taxes.  Is this in the Master Plan?  It is on the side of a hill and there is talk of springs.  I just would like to relate it to the problems that were created by the other developments on the side of the mountain.  I understand that the city’s response from the experts, the people who complain about getting flooded out when previously they were not flooded out, was that this was an act of nature and there is no law against storm water running across your property.  I contend that when man takes nature and messes with it and moves it around and destroys it and causes water to run on somebody’s property that the city does have some responsibility

 

A Beacon Resident – Ursuline Property – The situation is that if you do not have storm sewers to take that water that is coming down from these developments away from the lake, you will have a crisis there.  The water from melting snow is nothing compared to what rainwater will do to the property if this property is developed.  The water has to go somewhere other than into the lake.

 

Vinnie Cervone – 77 Depuyster – The land in question borders my property for about 200’.  It is very beautiful back there so naturally I do not want to see any development.  There is a 10 foot wide brook behind my property that gets to 150 feet wide when there is a rainstorm.  It washes everything out.  The traffic is already horrendous on that street.  The new high school is almost filled to capacity now.  You can never pay for your services in your taxes.  The tranquility of the nuns in the convent should be respected.  I urge you to do whatever you can to not let this development happen.

 

Shannon Murphy - The owner has been unwilling to speak to Scenic Hudson who is interested in purchasing over a third of the property.  There is money available but it has to be asked for and the owner has to be willing.  We don’t need another housing development.  We should consider parks.  We need open space such as woods, fields and streams.  It can be used by all of us and improve our quality of life here.  We have to go after it and believe that it is possible because it is.

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson St. Sept 28 2003 – On September 28, 2002, we had a terrible rainstorm.  I took some pictures of the Ursuline property and surrounding properties.  I have these pictures that you can all look at. I am reading from a comprehensive plan of 1974.  He read an article about what was supposed to happen in recreation

 

Peter Gadbois, 88 Jessen Place – I moved to Beacon from Fishkill because it was a place of my choice.  Beacon has come up since I moved here and seemed to have plans to make Beacon community friendly. Poughkeepsie and Newburgh had tried to renovate their town but it did not work.  Beacon kept going forward instead of going backwards.  My back yard is connected to the beautiful Hiddenbrook property.  Never in my wildest dreams did I think I would be told that cluster housing is the best way to preserve land.  The water problem cannot be taken care of by sewers and drainage.  I would like to see the engineers study that property before you do anything.  I would like to see what the master plan has for that property. This property should not be used for clustered housing.  From what I am hearing here and what I read in the paper, I don’t think we are dealing with developers who really care about Beacon.

 

Tim Kelleher, 14 Laurel Street – I urge people here to come and take a look at what development is doing to my property before this project starts. They took every tree down and everyone here knew about it and did nothing.  They will do the same thing on Jessen Street.  You had better stand up and make this not happen.

 

Mike McConnell – I grew up near Hiddenbrook.   If you walk through the property, there is no way to make a road.  In the paper it says that someone bought four acres. How could this happen if the zoning is not in place?  Note:  He was told that the sale is contingent on the zoning being approved.

 

Bernadette Clement, 82 Jessen Place – On the proposals that they have, they want to build a road into our development.  I just think that’s wrong.

 

No further comments

 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

Local Laws and Ordinances:

NEW BUSINESS:

 

Resolutions:

 

1.  Resolution No. 23 of 2005 – Authorize Mayor to Bid and Execute contract with Roehrs Construction for Cross Street Parking Lot.  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun

 

RESOLVED, that the Mayor be authorized to accept the lowest responsible bid submitted by Roehrs Construction of Clintondale, NY for the Cross Street Parking Lot Project and be it further

 

RESOLVED, that the Mayor be hereby authorized to execute a contract with, Roehrs Construction of Clintondale, New York in the amount of $89,727.00 for the Cross Street Parking Lot Project.

 

Motion to Authorize Mayor to Bid and Execute Contract:  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

2.  Resolution No. 24 of 2005 - Authorize the Office of the Assessor to Issue a Corrected Bill for 2005 Real Property Taxes, 23 Helen Court.

 

WHEREAS, application for Alternative Veteran's Exemption was filed on February 25, 2003 and accepted subject to receiving the deed for real property located at 23 Helen Court, Grid No. 6054‑04‑737126, and

 

WHEREAS, the deed was received and processed on March 14, 2003, at which time due to clerical error the Office of the Assessor failed to record the Veteran's exemptions on the tax rolls, and

 

WHEREAS, the amount levied for 2005 county and city taxes was $1,806.16 which with the Veteran's exemptions as provided under 458‑a RPTL should have been $1547.29, and

 

WHEREAS, the Dutchess County Real Property Tax Service and the Office of the Assessor recommend that the application for a correction be approved,

 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the application for correction of the 2004 tax roll to reflect the Veterans exemption for 23 Helen Court is hereby approved, and further

 

BE IT RESOLVED, that notice of said approval and a corrected bill for the 2004 county and city real property taxes in the amount of $1,547.29 shall be issued to Michael F. Kozak and Danielle M. Kozak, the owners of real property located at 23 Helen Court.

 

Motion to Authorize the Office of the Assessor to Issue a Corrected Bill:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

3.  Resolution No. 25 of 2005 – Authorize Mayor to Sign Agreement Extending Current Sales Tax Agreement with Dutchess County for five Years (December 31, 2005December 31, 2009) read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Beacon hereby authorize the Mayor to sign the extension of the Sales Tax Agreement between Dutchess County, the City of Poughkeepsie and the City of Beacon for the period March 1, 2005 through February 28, 2010.

 

Motion to authorize Mayor to Sign Agreement Extending Current Sales Tax Agreement:  Council Member Thompson.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Local Laws and Ordinances:

 

1.  Resolution No. 26 of 2005 – Proposed Local Law A:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R1-10 One Family Residence District to R1-40 One Family Residence District.  Set Public Hearing for Monday, March 21, 2005.  First Reading:  Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

Motion to set Public Hearing on March 21, 2005:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, five voted “yes” and Council Member Kyriacou voted “no”. With a vote of five “yes” and one “no”, motion carried.

 

2.  Resolution No. 27 of 2005 – Proposed Local Law B:  Changing the Zoning of Property from $-1-40 One Family Residence District to R-1-80 One Family Residence District.  Set Public Hearing for Monday, March 21, 2005.  First Reading: Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

Motion to set Public Hearing for March 21, 2005:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  On a roll call vote, there were five “yes” and Council Member Kyriacou voted “no.”  With a vote of five “yes” and one “no” motion carried

 

3.  Resolution No. 28 of 2005 – Proposed Local Law C:  Changing the Zoning of Property from R-1-40 One Family Residence District to R1-120 One Family District.  Set Public Hearing for March 21, 2005.  First Reading: Read by City Administrator, Joseph Braun.

 

Motion to set Public Hearing for March 21, 2005:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Way.  On a roll call vote, five voted “yes” and Council Member Kyriacou voted “no”.  With a vote of five “yes” and one “no”, motion carried.

 

Ratifications:

 

1.  Resolution No. 29 of 2005 – Ratifications:  Mase Hook and Ladder: 

 

1.      Kevin Eagan Jr. as Active Member of Mase Hook and Ladder effective March 1, 2005.

2.      John L. Miller Jr. as a Jr. Active Member of Mase Hook and Ladder effective March 1, 2005.

3.      Kenneth Durr remove from Active Rolls effective March 1, 2005.

 

Motion to Ratify:  Council Member Fasano.  Seconded:  Council Member Thompson. All voted in favor, motion carried.

 

Appointments/Announcements:

 

Announcement:  City of Beacon Housing Authority:  Carolyn Serino – Five Year Term – Term to Expire March 31, 2010.

 

Last opportunity for Public Comments:

 

Tom Baldino: distributed the following comments to the Mayor and the City of Beacon Council Members:

 

I have just purchased wind power, which with my solar plates makes me completely free of using fossil fuels for the generation of my electricity. The use of this wind power adds a mere $60 to my annual electricity bill. The town of Fishkill has now moved from purchasing 60% of its electricity from wind to 100%.

 

Was the resolution this Council unanimously passed calling for the two dirty coal burning plants three miles to the north of us to conform to higher standards out of concern for the health of our citizens a real concern or just a breath of wind amounting to nothing? With the threat of global warming, that our Johnny ‑‑come‑lately president has now come to acknowledge, you should be ashamed of yourselves to allow other countries and communities to carry the burden of reducing dependence on fossil fuels especially since our country produces 25% of the worlds pollution and the most per capita in the world.

 

I have tried to arrange for a salesman to come and talk at a meeting and answer any questions you might have concerning the purchase of wind power. The salesman is ready to come but my request has been rejected. Is the Council overburdened? Lately a meeting was cancelled because there were too few agenda items. Last week the meeting was over early, because there was a light agenda. I believe that this is an ideal time to consider my request once again to have the salesman make a presentation. If you can spend $8000+ on a row of trees to screen the aesthetically unappealing transfer station, you can spend the same amount on the purchase of wind power and put some real power behind your wind. I believe that if you were willing you could purchase a bit of wind power at present with no bad consequences, but you certainly should be ready to swing into action when the State Senate makes the purchase legal. Presented by Tom Baldino to the Beacon City Council, March 7, 2005.

 

Gary and Christine Van Hoy:  Regarding their property.  I want to understand how decisions are made.  No one asked what we were asking for.  Why was it suggested that we come to the Council Meeting this evening and speak to the council members about our request.  Mr. And Mrs. Van Hoy were referred to the Zoning Board to appeal their negative decision.

 

Dennis Pavelock, 34 Judson Street – Gave information from a local artist regarding murals.  He would like to do a mural on the coffee house to see what response he gets.  He will be here on the 21st.  I have comments regarding the waterline issue.  I was not satisfied with the decision.  I think that should be looked at again.

 

Betty DiPompo:  I want to thank Mike Fasano for showing his disapproval of the letter in the Dispatch regarding our Police Officers.  There was no need for this letter.  I am disappointed in the person who sent it to the Newspaper.  Every time I come here, I say how we have a shortage of policemen.  We never had a full staff.  As a taxpayer, I want this stopped.  What are you doing to our police?

 

Jonathan Crone, Vice President PBA – Regarding the Police Dept. We do not care if you give the crossing guards to another department.  We have enough to do without doing crossing guard duty.  We did have 14 guards at one time but some of them quit.

 

Fritz Ohlhoff – Thank you Mike for the interest in the work we did at the memorial building.  The other day I found a drug free sign on my property.  It must have gotten knocked off by the snowplow.  I saw the plan of the library and it is excellent.  Thank you

 

No further comments

 

Budget Amendments:  Council Action Budget Amendments – March 7, 2005

 

1.         Amend the General Fund Balance (Code:  A 909) in the amount of $2,700.00 for the Police Department Juvenile Division (A 6123.X1050.00).  These funds are required to complete the accreditation project that was authorized by the council amendment on August 16, 2004 for $3,000.  Only a portion of the project was finished in 2004, leaving the $2,700 unexpended balance to cover overtime required by the clerical staff to complete the work in 2005.

 

Motion to Amend the General Fund Budget in the amount of $2,700.00 for the Police Department Juvenile Division:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, five voted “yes” and Council Member Kyriacou voted “no”.  On a vote of five “yes” and one “no”, motion carried.

 

2.         Amend the General Fund Budget for the Fire Department 2004 Floor Repair (A 3410.X4473.04) by transferring $375.00 to Highway Department Materials and Supplies (Code:  A 5110.X4160.00).  This transfer is to cover the cost of stock materials used to prepare the Fire Department floor prior to pouring new concrete.

 

Motion to Amend the General Fund Budget for the Fire Department 2004 Floor Repair:  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  On a roll call vote, all voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

3.         To Amend the General Fund - Crossing Guards line item by adding $8,471.00 – Supplemental Appropriation – Crossing Guards Budget Increase from $8:50 to $10.50 an hour.

 

Motion to approve Supplemental Appropriation by adding $8,471.00 to Crossing Guard Budget:  Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  On a roll call vote, five voted “yes” and Council Member Kyriacou voted “no”.  With a vote of five “yes” and one “no”, motion carried.

 

Review of Bills:  Disbursements as of March 7, 2005                                     $326,072.42

           

Next Workshop Date:            Monday, March 14, 2005 at 7:00 pm.Municipal Center

Next Council Meeting:            Monday, March 21, 2005 at 7:30 p.m.Municipal Center

 

Motion to Enter into an Executive Session at 9:27 p.m. for Personnel Issues   Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Antalek.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Motion to end Executive Session at 9:50 p.m. Council Member Way.  Seconded:  Council Member Leake.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

                                                                                                                                

Adjournment:  Motion to adjourn at 9:50 p.m.  Council Member Antalek.  Seconded:  Council Member Fasano.  All voted in favor.  Motion carried.

 

Text from Reports for March 7, 2005

 

Mayor’s Correspondence:

 

02/28/05:  M.T. O’Leary – Chief Executive Officer – Hudson Valley Housing Development

RE: Meadow Ridge II Senior Citizen Residence

 

This is to inform you of our intention to submit the above referenced application under the Federal and State Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program to the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal. These Programs were established by the Federal Tax Reform Act of 1986 (with a new Section 42 in the Internal Revenue Code) which authorized federal assistance in the form of tax credits for owners of rental housing that is reserved for households earning 60% or less of the area median income and by Article 2-A of the Public Housing Law which authorized state tax credits for owners of rental housing that is reserved for households earning 90% of less of the area median income, respectively.

 

Furthermore, under the Internal Revenue Code Section 42(m)(A)(ii), an allocation of Credit to a project cannot be made unless the Chief Executive Officer (or the equivalent) of the local jurisdiction within which the proposed project is located, is notified and is provided a reasonable opportunity to comment on the project.

 

If you have any comments regarding the enclosed application, please submit them within 20 days of receipt of the enclosed application to:

 

New York State Division of Homing and Community Renewal (DHCR) Hampton Plaza

38-40 State Street, 6th Floor Albany, New York 12207 - Attention: Arnon Alder, Program Manager for the Federal Program 518.474.3196 or Nina Moore, Program Manager for the State Program 518.473.8551

 

The returned certified mail postal receipt for this package accepted and signed for by your office, will be forwarded to DHCR to serve as proof that the requirements of Section 42 (m) (A) (ii) have been met by this Credit Program applicant.

 

If you wish to discuss the enclosed application or any other aspect of the proposed project, please feel free to contact me at the address above or call me at 914.297.2004.

 

02/28/05:  New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

RE: Circle M Wood Treating Corporation - Fishkill

 

The community is invited to attend a public meeting on March 14, 2005 at 7:00 pm in the Fishkill Town Hall to discuss the proposed remediation of soil contamination at the Circle M Wood Treating Corporation site located at the end of Brockway Road in the Chelsea Industrial Park. This

Meeting is sponsored by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). The NYSDEC will present several

alternatives that were evaluated to address this contamination, along with the rationale for recommending the Proposed Remedial Action Plan (PRAP).

 

During the meeting, the NYSDEC will accept comments on the proposed plan. The NYSDEC will also accept written comments on the plan through March 30, 2005. After considering both verbal and written comments on the proposed plan, the NYSDEC will select the remedy for the site and issue a Record of Decision (ROD).

 

SITE DESCRIPTION

 

The Circle M Wood Treating Corporation (Circle M) site is a 21-acre former manufacturing facility located within the 58.6-acre Chelsea Industrial Park (the Park). The Park is bounded by railroad tracks (owned by the Consolidated Rail Corporation) and the Hudson River to the west; and an unnamed stream and residential property to the north, east and south. The site includes five of the six buildings in the Park currently used for industrial purposes, including the building used by the former Circle M Wood Treating Corporation.

 

The topography of the Circle M site is relatively flat. The soil is characterized by thick deposits of silt and clay overlain by fill that is up to 8 feet in depth. The depth to the groundwater table ranges from 4 to 11 feet below ground surface in the silt or clay layer. The silt and clay layers have low permeabilities and, consequently, the groundwater flow rate is low. Potable water supply for the nearby properties is provided by the Rombout Water District. There are two private wells reported to be within a quarter mile radius of the site.

 

SITE HISTORY

 

Circle M specialized in a process in which wood was treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA) in the eastern half of an 18,500 square foot building. This building was one of at least six major buildings located in the Park (see Fig. 2). The manufacturing operation ran for five years, from 1986 through 1990. - Circle M vacated the property in early 1990.

 

In 1990, the NYSDEC listed the site as a Class 2 site in the Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York. A Class 2 site is a site where the release of hazardous waste into the environment presents a significant threat to the public health or the environment, and action is

required